hector III

hector III — CS2 Stats

76561199047890738[U:1:1087625010]Steam profile ↗

732Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,552Purple band · top ~26.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17877 of 29531 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,089 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhector IIIFACEITLevel 5 · 1,089 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,552 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58384Last 10058%Win rateLLWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression6.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch7.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time681ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 681ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.53Best rating — nuke 11–1
130Biggest win — office
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 26nukeWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33191458%0.01
dust2S2618869%0.02
nukeC167944%0.04
infernoA127558%0.01
overpass43175%0.00
office31233%-0.02
anubis2020%-0.06
ancient110100%-0.00
warden110100%0.10
vertigo110100%-0.02
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
64%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
82.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1267%1.2017.6
Nuke850%1.5418.3
Dust25100%0.9818.0
Vertigo450%1.2912.3
Ancient250%1.0415.0
Overpass250%0.8613.5
Anubis250%1.1411.5
Inferno10%1.0017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
90.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
675msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
11.13HE damage / grenade
8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.9292% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0414%21 Jun
mirage9–130.0415%18 Jun
nuke13–70.0517%11 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0620%10 Jun
nuke4–130.0222%8 Jun
mirage7–130.0024%26 May
dust213–80.0626%24 May
nuke10–13-0.0319%20 May
dust213–100.1228%17 May
dust213–4-0.0716%17 May
inferno13–110.028%13 May
dust29–13-0.0316%9 May
overpass13–80.0521%8 May
inferno8–130.0218%8 May
dust213–8-0.0218%7 May
mirage13–110.0123%7 May
mirage7–13-0.0718%7 May
dust215–150.0023%7 May
inferno8–130.0424%7 May
dust27–130.0646%19 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0317%13 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0425%2 Mar
dust21–130.0225%2 Mar
nuke11–10.5395%2 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0024%1 Mar
dust213–40.1148%1 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0036%1 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0133%1 Mar
mirage13–10.0517%1 Mar
dust210–4-0.0145%1 Mar
mirage13–100.1728%1 Mar
dust213–2-0.0138%1 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0022%1 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0329%28 Feb
mirage3–130.0150%28 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0353%27 Feb
dust211–13-0.0223%27 Feb
dust212–16-0.0618%27 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0322%27 Feb
overpass13–50.0421%27 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0231%27 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0038%26 Feb
inferno13–70.0055%26 Feb
mirage7–13-0.1422%26 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0335%26 Feb
dust25–0-0.0233%26 Feb
dust213–10-0.0829%26 Feb
nuke13–110.0523%26 Feb
dust213–100.0859%25 Feb
inferno12–12-0.0537%25 Feb
dust26–20.0133%25 Feb
office6–13-0.1029%25 Feb
dust28–13-0.0256%25 Feb
mirage13–20.1425%25 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0022%24 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0220%24 Feb
mirage10–60.0337%24 Feb
mirage19–170.1025%24 Feb
inferno13–100.0248%23 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0265%23 Feb
mirage9–130.0144%23 Feb
dust213–20.0678%23 Feb
nuke13–70.0245%23 Feb
overpass13–10.0532%23 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0011%23 Feb
office6–13-0.0643%23 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0319%22 Feb
mirage12–120.0530%22 Feb
dust213–100.0059%21 Feb
nuke15–150.0221%20 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0516%20 Feb
anubis4–9-0.1012%20 Feb
office13–00.1087%20 Feb
warden13–80.1016%19 Feb
mirage13–100.0821%19 Feb
mirage13–100.0114%19 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0721%19 Feb
dust225–22-0.0221%18 Feb
nuke3–13-0.058%18 Feb
vertigo13–5-0.0217%17 Feb
inferno13–40.1714%17 Feb
mirage13–100.0313%13 Feb
dust213–11-0.0242%13 Feb
mirage16–130.0218%11 Feb
mirage3–130.0110%10 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0327%10 Feb
dust213–110.0018%10 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0220%9 Feb
nuke2–8-0.0013%24 Oct
train9–130.0117%23 Oct
mirage4–110.0323%20 Oct
mirage13–70.0418%20 Oct
nuke13–100.089%18 Oct
dust213–30.1026%18 Oct
dust213–70.1416%18 Oct
mirage11–130.0618%18 Oct
overpass0–4-0.1343%18 Oct
mirage13–30.029%18 Oct
nuke13–80.1125%18 Oct
dust29–130.0219%17 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →