nap enjoyer

nap enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561199038212831[U:1:1077947103]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

890Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnap enjoyerFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning47
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY444610Last 10044%Win rateLWLLWLWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression6.5
Utility4.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time595ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — cache 13–2
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 25nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25151060%-0.01
officeD2371630%-0.01
infernoB189950%0.00
cacheC104640%0.04
nukeD72529%-0.04
overpassC52340%-0.03
dust2A53260%0.02
ancient42250%-0.03
anubis2020%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

640Matches
52%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
69.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5864%1.1214.6
Inferno2552%1.0314.4
Dust22348%0.9113.4
Ancient1850%0.9714.9
Anubis1173%0.9416.6
Vertigo1127%1.1914.0
Nuke757%1.0816.6
Overpass2100%1.0315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
589msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
11.11HE damage / grenade
4.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1073% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office6–13-0.0044%17 May
cache13–110.0214%9 May
cache6–13-0.0626%9 May
cache9–13-0.0625%7 May
cache13–100.0626%3 May
cache8–130.1025%2 May
cache13–20.2422%2 May
inferno8–13-0.0231%2 May
cache12–12-0.0015%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0921%29 Apr
cache12–120.1338%29 Apr
cache6–130.0131%29 Apr
office7–13-0.1019%22 Apr
overpass1–8-0.0622%22 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0030%22 Apr
inferno13–90.0625%22 Apr
nuke13–11-0.1115%21 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0311%21 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0431%21 Apr
inferno9–20.0829%21 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0530%20 Apr
ancient13–70.0837%20 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0117%18 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0125%18 Apr
dust213–110.0429%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0931%18 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0923%16 Apr
office4–13-0.119%15 Apr
mirage12–120.0216%15 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0129%12 Apr
office6–20.0817%6 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0522%6 Apr
inferno13–60.0427%6 Apr
ancient8–13-0.1119%24 Mar
anubis2–7-0.0342%24 Mar
office13–110.0333%23 Mar
office6–13-0.0224%23 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0828%18 Mar
overpass5–13-0.048%15 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0720%15 Mar
mirage13–80.0121%13 Mar
mirage16–140.0235%28 Feb
dust213–00.139%28 Feb
inferno9–20.0625%28 Feb
inferno9–50.0927%28 Feb
office6–13-0.1129%27 Feb
inferno5–10-0.0514%23 Feb
overpass13–40.0139%23 Feb
mirage13–80.0443%22 Feb
inferno13–90.016%22 Feb
dust27–130.0022%22 Feb
vertigo1–13-0.0313%21 Feb
dust22–13-0.0818%21 Feb
office12–120.0226%21 Feb
office12–12-0.0733%15 Feb
office9–130.0723%14 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0329%14 Feb
nuke13–60.0152%13 Feb
inferno15–150.0129%13 Feb
inferno13–90.0225%8 Feb
mirage13–60.0515%8 Feb
office13–100.0824%7 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0210%7 Feb
mirage4–13-0.1318%4 Feb
overpass9–13-0.049%2 Feb
office13–70.0120%2 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0327%31 Jan
office11–130.0123%30 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0117%29 Jan
dust213–70.0030%29 Jan
office13–10.025%29 Jan
mirage8–13-0.047%29 Jan
nuke11–13-0.1010%28 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0322%28 Jan
nuke6–130.0033%28 Jan
office13–5-0.0411%28 Jan
office2–130.026%28 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0319%28 Jan
ancient0–8-0.0850%27 Jan
mirage13–4-0.035%27 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0513%25 Jan
mirage13–90.0620%25 Jan
office12–12-0.0628%22 Jan
office3–13-0.056%22 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0443%21 Jan
mirage9–130.0118%21 Jan
office13–7-0.0117%21 Jan
office6–13-0.0022%20 Jan
mirage6–130.0624%20 Jan
office12–12-0.0150%19 Jan
mirage13–40.0122%19 Jan
office4–13-0.0356%16 Jan
inferno6–13-0.078%16 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0315%16 Jan
inferno13–70.0833%16 Jan
mirage13–16-0.064%15 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0121%15 Jan
office12–12-0.018%13 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0619%13 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0219%13 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →