Stylish42021 — CS2 Stats

76561199035752548[U:1:1075486820]

1,004Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,260 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42

Positioning53

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–57–2Last 10041%Win rateWWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2

Aggression5.4

Utility3.7

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2

Positioning5.3

Utility3.7

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time604ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–10

13–1Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	C	24	10–14	42%	-0.00
nuke	S	19	13–6	68%	0.00
anubis	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.03
mirage	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.02
dust2	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.06
overpass	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.05
inferno	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

493Matches

50%Win rate

0.96Avg K/D

71.5ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	110	55%	0.95	14.7
Mirage	103	46%	1.02	14.3
Nuke	89	51%	0.94	14.5
Anubis	54	44%	0.96	14.3
Dust2	48	46%	0.83	13.8
Inferno	42	50%	0.96	14.6
Overpass	19	63%	1.17	15.3
Cache	16	44%	1.00	14.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy

29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.1%Spray accuracy

67.8%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

598msReaction time

24.1%T opening success

48.9%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

5.76HE damage / grenade

3.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4019 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.0748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	16%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	15%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	22%	17 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	9%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.07	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	13%	28 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.08	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	16–19	0.02	18%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	24%	9 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	5%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	15%	9 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	4%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	21%	3 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	18%	3 Jul →
overpass	9–13	0.03	18%	28 Jun →
ancient	16–13	0.04	17%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	18%	13 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.11	0%	6 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	14%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.04	34%	2 Jun →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	6%	1 Jun →
anubis	16–13	-0.03	14%	30 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	26%	29 May →
overpass	0–9	-0.28	0%	29 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	37%	29 May →
inferno	13–9	0.05	23%	29 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	14%	14 May →
ancient	8–13	0.01	17%	12 May →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	6%	10 May →
inferno	13–9	0.02	23%	10 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	19%	9 May →
nuke	13–10	0.11	13%	9 May →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	20%	9 May →
mirage	11–13	0.02	14%	9 May →
cache	16–14	0.02	22%	8 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	19%	8 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	7%	7 May →
overpass	13–11	0.02	12%	7 May →
inferno	13–8	0.05	15%	6 May →
cache	9–13	-0.03	29%	5 May →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	15%	4 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	9%	3 May →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	14%	3 May →
ancient	9–13	0.04	18%	27 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	12%	26 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	25%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.07	6%	22 Apr →
nuke	1–13	-0.11	15%	22 Apr →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	12%	22 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	6%	21 Apr →
anubis	13–9	0.00	16%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.03	7%	21 Apr →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	5%	21 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	16%	20 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	11%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–2	0.03	10%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	18%	19 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.00	14%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	16%	18 Apr →
overpass	13–5	-0.01	8%	18 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.00	18%	18 Apr →
dust2	1–13	-0.12	30%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.04	14%	18 Apr →
nuke	4–13	-0.14	5%	17 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	19%	17 Apr →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	19%	17 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	25%	17 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.01	19%	17 Apr →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	27%	17 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.10	25%	16 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.04	14%	15 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	3%	15 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	14%	15 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	16%	14 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.02	24%	14 Apr →
overpass	12–16	-0.03	19%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.01	37%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–1	0.11	25%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.05	18%	13 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	14%	13 Apr →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	11%	13 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	16%	13 Apr →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	17%	13 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	33%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	29%	13 Apr →
ancient	16–14	0.01	10%	13 Apr →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	9%	13 Apr →
overpass	12–16	-0.03	13%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	17%	12 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.06	15%	11 Apr →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	10%	11 Apr →
ancient	2–13	0.03	14%	11 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	11%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.01	17%	11 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	15%	11 Apr →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	15%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.07	20%	10 Apr →