umuliuz — CS2 Stats

76561199033650627[U:1:1073384899]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,494Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.9 Learning

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44

Positioning37

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–48–9Last 10043%Win rateLWLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4

Aggression1.8

Utility4.5

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 33% on T to 16% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4

Positioning3.7

Utility4.5

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels0.4

Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time671ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 671ms

Headshot accuracy22.3%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 9–1

13–2Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 15mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	18	6–12	33%	-0.02
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.01
anubis	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.02
ancient	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.01
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.04
inferno	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches

49%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

55.7ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	17	53%	0.87	10.9
Nuke	12	50%	0.67	10.3
Anubis	10	30%	0.74	13.1
Mirage	4	75%	1.29	13.3
Overpass	3	67%	1.07	11.7
Inferno	1	0%	0.50	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy

27.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.4%Spray accuracy

78.1%Counter-strafing

12.2°Preaim

661msReaction time

33.0%T opening success

16.3%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

3.5%Flash assists

4.69HE damage / grenade

6.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.183° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4673 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	0.02	31%	29 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	17%	29 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	15%	29 Aug →
vertigo	9–1	0.17	33%	29 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	14%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	15%	27 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	29%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	21%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	27%	26 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	18%	26 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	32%	25 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	28%	25 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	13%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	42%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.10	67%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	13%	18 Aug →
cache	8–0	0.05	25%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.03	35%	18 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	20%	17 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	24%	17 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	9%	16 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.02	20%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	14%	16 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	27%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	16%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.10	24%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	21%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	10%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	11%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	11 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	42%	11 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	50%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.02	0%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.00	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	11%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	17%	6 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	19%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	26%	5 Aug →
cache	9–3	-0.03	43%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	7%	5 Aug →
inferno	9–6	-0.01	17%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	13%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	31%	4 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.15	9%	3 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	26%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	30%	28 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	16%	28 Jul →
fachwerk	4–13	-0.05	34%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	19%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	7%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	13%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	25 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	19%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	24%	24 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.04	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	24%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.13	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.01	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	10%	22 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	30%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.09	19%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	32%	20 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.10	8%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	13%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	26%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	30%	20 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.03	13%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	16%	18 Jul →
ancient	12–12	-0.02	10%	17 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	23%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.03	36%	16 Jul →
overpass	8–8	0.04	10%	9 Jul →
inferno	5–9	0.01	18%	9 Jul →
debris	6–9	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
eldorado	8–8	-0.08	50%	9 Jul →
overpass	12–12	-0.03	23%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.09	10%	7 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	23%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.08	22%	7 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.07	20%	6 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	17%	6 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	19%	6 Jul →
anubis	9–2	-0.04	33%	6 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.05	19%	5 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	13%	5 Jul →