Strel0k — CS2 Stats

76561199033439403[U:1:1073173675]

1,835Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,297 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStrel0kFACEITLevel 10 · 2,297 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateWLLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression8.1
Utility4.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time559ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 8–1
130Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.03
mirageB22111150%0.02
ancientA148657%0.00
infernoC125742%0.01
nukeB105550%0.02
anubisS86275%0.03
overpassS64267%0.03
train32167%0.04
cache110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,928Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36651%1.0815.5
Dust229650%1.0916.1
Anubis25755%1.1216.2
Ancient23150%1.0915.8
Inferno14655%1.1516.1
Nuke10152%1.0816.1
Overpass4749%1.0015.7
Vertigo4753%1.1216.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
558msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
5.92HE damage / grenade
9.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4719 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3918% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0618%31 May
dust28–130.0227%28 May
dust211–13-0.0519%28 May
mirage13–90.0514%26 May
anubis13–100.0623%25 May
dust213–20.0211%23 May
dust213–2-0.0122%18 May
inferno10–130.0225%18 May
anubis6–13-0.0121%14 May
inferno10–13-0.0719%10 May
nuke13–50.0819%2 May
overpass7–130.0838%30 Apr
anubis13–50.0424%28 Apr
dust216–140.1024%28 Apr
dust210–13-0.0214%28 Apr
cache13–50.0326%27 Apr
anubis16–130.0219%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0425%27 Apr
dust211–130.0023%27 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0313%21 Apr
anubis13–70.0429%15 Apr
mirage13–90.0321%15 Apr
dust26–130.0134%10 Apr
anubis13–60.0934%9 Apr
ancient19–160.0526%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0145%3 Apr
dust213–70.0316%30 Mar
inferno9–130.0325%27 Mar
dust213–40.0630%26 Mar
inferno13–90.0015%23 Mar
inferno12–120.0522%21 Mar
dust210–13-0.0218%20 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0128%15 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0615%15 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0126%15 Mar
inferno8–120.0626%13 Mar
dust213–70.0114%13 Mar
mirage11–130.0019%12 Mar
anubis13–00.0019%1 Dec
ancient13–16-0.0515%1 Dec
nuke13–90.0924%29 Nov
dust211–130.0028%27 Nov
mirage14–160.0023%24 Nov
overpass9–13-0.0131%23 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0230%23 Nov
dust215–19-0.0116%22 Nov
dust213–20.0923%18 Nov
mirage10–130.0125%17 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0010%17 Nov
nuke1–13-0.0639%17 Nov
dust28–130.0941%17 Nov
nuke11–130.0720%17 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0317%12 Nov
ancient13–7-0.0516%12 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0117%5 Nov
nuke13–16-0.0512%4 Nov
inferno10–13-0.0019%3 Nov
train13–80.0520%3 Nov
dust213–80.0512%31 Oct
ancient13–6-0.0023%30 Oct
ancient13–10.0331%30 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0523%29 Oct
inferno13–7-0.0124%25 Oct
mirage6–130.0220%21 Oct
ancient7–130.0321%18 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0414%17 Oct
dust216–130.0523%16 Oct
mirage13–30.0122%1 Oct
ancient10–130.008%26 Sept
mirage1–2-0.0720%26 Sept
dust213–70.0518%25 Sept
overpass13–6-0.0219%25 Sept
ancient16–130.0518%24 Sept
nuke4–130.0320%24 Sept
mirage13–80.0224%22 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0416%18 Sept
mirage13–50.0313%25 Aug
ancient13–70.0338%20 Aug
overpass13–100.0326%19 Aug
dust213–40.0025%19 Aug
ancient7–130.0320%19 Aug
nuke13–100.0734%31 Jul
overpass13–60.0918%30 Jul
overpass13–90.0217%29 Jul
mirage13–160.0125%29 Jul
inferno11–6-0.0126%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0426%26 Jul
train7–13-0.0321%26 Jul
mirage13–110.1016%23 Jul
dust210–13-0.0515%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0343%19 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0111%19 Jul
dust213–30.0323%26 May
inferno13–110.0215%25 May
train13–90.0940%18 May
anubis4–130.0119%14 May
dust213–70.0423%7 May
dust213–20.1133%5 May
mirage8–10.1542%5 May
mirage10–13-0.0111%5 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →