dt — CS2 Stats

76561199027231336[U:1:1066965608]✓ No bans

658Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2163 of 12968 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdtFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning52
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateWWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression6.3
Utility3.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.2
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time501ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–5
133Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.01
dust2B29131645%0.01
cacheA1610663%0.00
anubisC83538%0.01
ancientA74357%-0.01
infernoS64267%0.04
nukeA53260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
506msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
5.94HE damage / grenade
9.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0230%27 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0617%27 Aug
dust26–13-0.0222%27 Aug
cache16–120.0121%26 Aug
dust213–80.0737%26 Aug
inferno13–160.0520%26 Aug
anubis3–130.0118%26 Aug
dust213–70.0726%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0323%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0713%24 Aug
dust213–70.0224%24 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0211%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0024%24 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0219%22 Aug
cache15–150.0217%22 Aug
dust213–70.0341%21 Aug
cache13–5-0.0418%20 Aug
dust213–50.2224%20 Aug
mirage10–40.0128%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0332%19 Aug
ancient13–90.0323%18 Aug
anubis13–70.0429%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0522%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.049%18 Aug
dust213–30.0917%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.107%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0226%16 Aug
dust213–30.0526%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0226%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0722%16 Aug
ancient13–100.0324%16 Aug
cache9–13-0.0124%16 Aug
cache13–80.0120%15 Aug
dust211–130.0134%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0024%14 Aug
cache13–110.0319%13 Aug
cache13–110.0325%13 Aug
anubis14–160.0329%11 Aug
nuke11–130.0027%11 Aug
nuke13–90.0136%10 Aug
dust27–130.0225%10 Aug
inferno5–90.0919%9 Aug
mirage6–130.1114%9 Aug
mirage5–130.0729%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0015%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0526%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0625%3 Aug
mirage13–60.039%3 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0330%3 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0214%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0725%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0512%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.0421%2 Aug
dust20–130.019%2 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0217%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0211%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0729%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0326%30 Jul
inferno13–100.0225%29 Jul
dust213–40.0631%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0218%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0217%29 Jul
anubis13–6-0.037%28 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0211%28 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0215%27 Jul
dust213–90.0727%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0124%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0329%27 Jul
cache13–90.0620%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0319%26 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0321%26 Jul
inferno13–100.0410%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0328%26 Jul
dust27–130.0319%26 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0325%26 Jul
dust213–60.0438%25 Jul
cache7–130.0427%25 Jul
inferno16–120.0319%25 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0514%24 Jul
mirage13–70.0517%24 Jul
mirage8–130.0425%24 Jul
cache4–13-0.0913%23 Jul
mirage13–90.1225%23 Jul
mirage11–130.0120%23 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0126%22 Jul
cache13–90.0327%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0519%22 Jul
dust216–14-0.0015%21 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0324%20 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0121%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0220%20 Jul
dust213–50.0520%20 Jul
dust213–16-0.0716%19 Jul
cache6–130.0540%19 Jul
cache13–90.0426%19 Jul
cache13–3-0.0633%19 Jul
dust213–90.0518%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0124%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0833%18 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0011%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →