blinchiki — CS2 Stats

CA76561199022586813[U:1:1062321085]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

867Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,451Purple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11387 of 24974 tracked

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning51

Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWLLWLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression8.5

Utility1.9

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.1

Utility1.9

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time598ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — vertigo 9–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 68% over 31nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	31	21–10	68%	0.03
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	0.00
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
inferno	S	6	4–2	67%	0.05
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.14
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.31

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches

64%Win rate

1.34Avg K/D

99.8ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

42%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	5	40%	1.23	22.2
Ancient	3	33%	0.98	18.3
Cache	2	100%	1.98	23.0
Dust2	2	100%	1.30	22.5
Inferno	1	0%	0.80	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.2%Spray accuracy

87.1%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

589msReaction time

37.1%T opening success

50.6%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

5.2%Flash assists

4.59HE damage / grenade

3.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.1381% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–13	0.05	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	18%	18 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	26%	18 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	11%	17 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	24%	17 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	18%	13 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	18%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	33%	12 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	12%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	11%	8 Aug →
ancient	6–0	0.12	32%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	32%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	47%	8 Aug →
office	13–7	0.00	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	29%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	8%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	38%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	28%	7 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.05	8%	7 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.07	11%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	6%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	16%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	30%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	11%	23 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	12%	23 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	28%	22 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	16%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	33%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	27%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	32%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	14%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	28%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.04	50%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.11	28%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	21%	15 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	16%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	19%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	31%	14 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	33%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.02	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.12	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.03	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–1	0.04	9%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	13%	13 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.10	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	13%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.06	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	29%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	22%	12 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.06	22%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.15	31%	11 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.07	22%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.13	24%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	44%	10 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.11	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	10%	10 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	8%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	31%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.00	18%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	29%	9 Jul →
dust2	4–1	0.11	14%	9 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.06	19%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	14%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.07	25%	9 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	28%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.14	17%	9 Jul →
overpass	9–6	0.23	17%	8 Jul →
vertigo	9–2	0.31	34%	8 Jul →
nuke	5–9	0.06	19%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	38%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	29 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	22%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.04	27%	29 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.06	22%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.03	13%	29 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	13%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	16%	28 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	14%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.06	25%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.06	36%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	23%	26 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.09	17%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.06	14%	24 Jun →