stayfrosty

stayfrosty — CS2 Stats

76561199013668639[U:1:1053402911]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,305Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,820Purple band · top ~21.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20646 of 37581 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 988 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstayfrostyFACEITLevel 4 · 988 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,820 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning55
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55405Last 10055%Win rateLWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression7.1
Utility6.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time622ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 9–4
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2719870%0.01
mirageB26131350%-0.00
cacheC146843%0.02
infernoB115645%0.00
nukeB84450%0.01
ancientS86275%-0.00
anubisD62433%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
45%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
78.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2748%1.0914.0
Nuke1145%1.0115.6
Dust21145%0.8416.4
Inferno1070%1.2418.8
Ancient825%0.8011.1
Anubis250%0.8411.5
Train250%1.0813.5
Vertigo10%0.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
627msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
12.06HE damage / grenade
15.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.4102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–130.0222%30 Aug
mirage13–40.0620%29 Aug
mirage3–13-0.075%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0513%29 Aug
nuke10–20.04100%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0412%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0112%28 Aug
cache12–16-0.0018%28 Aug
nuke9–130.0630%28 Aug
cache13–70.006%28 Aug
mirage7–130.0232%28 Aug
dust213–110.0321%27 Aug
inferno9–40.1214%27 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0123%8 Aug
nuke13–50.0615%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0026%8 Aug
cache16–130.0322%8 Aug
mirage13–50.0628%8 Aug
ancient16–130.006%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0519%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0119%7 Aug
dust216–130.0212%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0417%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0321%6 Aug
cache10–13-0.0510%6 Aug
dust213–8-0.0316%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0015%6 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0117%6 Aug
dust29–130.0227%6 Aug
cache6–130.059%6 Aug
mirage14–160.0522%5 Aug
dust214–16-0.0313%5 Aug
dust213–70.0940%5 Aug
mirage16–130.0619%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0124%5 Aug
dust213–50.0014%5 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0712%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0314%4 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0314%4 Aug
dust216–130.0018%4 Aug
mirage3–130.0013%4 Aug
dust213–11-0.0616%31 Jul
mirage6–1-0.0323%31 Jul
dust213–100.0311%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.087%31 Jul
inferno16–140.0027%31 Jul
inferno8–130.0218%31 Jul
dust213–30.0821%31 Jul
nuke1–13-0.1025%31 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0416%31 Jul
cache6–30.0615%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0219%21 Jul
cache8–13-0.0116%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0213%21 Jul
cache15–15-0.0320%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0820%21 Jul
dust213–110.0226%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.0517%21 Jul
cache13–30.0713%21 Jul
dust28–130.0119%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0817%5 Jul
dust213–90.0226%5 Jul
anubis9–130.0210%5 Jul
dust213–10.0517%5 Jul
cache8–130.0118%4 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0115%4 Jul
inferno15–150.0011%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0017%4 Jul
nuke13–110.0213%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0413%4 Jul
nuke12–120.0912%3 Jul
cache5–10.0919%3 Jul
dust213–40.0512%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0316%2 Jul
dust28–130.0218%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0417%2 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0217%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0618%1 Jul
cache7–13-0.0318%1 Jul
cache13–40.0619%1 Jul
anubis13–50.0320%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0212%1 Jul
dust23–13-0.0114%29 Jun
ancient8–13-0.085%28 Jun
mirage13–7-0.028%28 Jun
mirage4–12-0.0714%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0514%28 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0112%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0219%27 Jun
dust215–15-0.0215%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0914%27 Jun
dust213–90.0921%27 Jun
inferno13–60.0236%27 Jun
dust213–7-0.0113%27 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0111%27 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0218%26 Jun
dust213–100.0817%26 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0412%26 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0327%26 Jun
anubis13–100.0119%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →