✈︎𝗜𝗜 — CS2 Stats

US76561199012371307[U:1:1052105579]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

956Tracked matches42%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating11,928Blue band · top ~44.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#24866 of 35831 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning59

Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLWLLWLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8

Aggression4.2

Utility1.9

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels1.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning5.9

Utility1.9

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact2.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time597ms−91ms

first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms

Headshot accuracy25.1%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 6–13

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 29% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	29	19–10	66%	0.04
mirage	D	17	5–12	29%	0.02
anubis	C	16	6–10	38%	0.03
ancient	C	15	6–9	40%	0.03
inferno	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.00
train	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

619msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

36.2%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

10.1%Flash assists

4.11HE damage / grenade

1.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.39 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.0954% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	4–13	0.06	25%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	25%	29 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.12	7%	28 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	29%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	33%	28 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	12%	28 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	28%	28 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.07	30%	27 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	29%	26 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	24%	26 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.07	29%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	33%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.15	38%	22 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	30%	21 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.18	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.09	41%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	28%	20 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	12%	19 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.07	23%	19 Aug →
train	11–13	-0.00	24%	19 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	16%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.07	18%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.07	31%	19 Aug →
mirage	2–0	-0.09	0%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.07	22%	18 Aug →
nuke	11–2	0.12	30%	18 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	21%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.07	30%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.13	29%	18 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.04	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	43%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.03	32%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–2	-0.02	30%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.16	22%	15 Aug →
debris	9–3	0.14	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.09	24%	15 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	26%	15 Aug →
train	13–7	0.10	29%	13 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.05	16%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.07	30%	12 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	22%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	47%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	25%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	29%	6 Aug →
nuke	2–10	-0.01	36%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–1	-0.01	32%	6 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.05	24%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	19%	4 Aug →
train	9–13	-0.02	14%	3 Aug →
train	13–6	0.05	30%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.01	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.08	9%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.07	19%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	30%	2 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.11	25%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.11	23%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.09	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.17	25%	31 Jul →
train	13–8	-0.08	42%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	26%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	15%	30 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.00	27%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	16%	29 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.11	41%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	28%	29 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	17%	29 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.09	23%	29 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	17%	29 Jul →
train	13–7	0.09	37%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.05	25%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.14	12%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.01	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	21%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.05	30%	28 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.11	42%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–1	-0.11	38%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.05	23%	28 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.10	30%	28 Jul →
inferno	9–9	-0.02	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	2–8	-0.04	30%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	43%	28 Jul →