Annamaria — CS2 Stats

76561199008952437[U:1:1048686709]

1,529Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,738Purple band · top ~25.5% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning50

Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateWWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1

Aggression1.8

Utility3.3

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.0

Utility3.3

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.3

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time584ms−61ms

first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy17.1%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 13–7

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

11–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 54% over 69mirageWeakest map · 41% over 29

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	B	69	37–32	54%	-0.00
mirage	C	29	12–17	41%	-0.02
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

321Matches

50%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

75.1ADR

29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win

11%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	18	44%	1.40	14.8
Ancient	10	50%	1.09	14.4
Anubis	5	60%	0.90	14.8
Vertigo	3	33%	2.11	20.3
Dust2	3	67%	1.08	11.0
Inferno	2	100%	1.62	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

579msReaction time

18.8%T opening success

32.1%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

6.39HE damage / grenade

6.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4824 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.7912% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	19–17	0.01	12%	25 Aug →
vertigo	16–13	0.01	15%	25 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	27%	25 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.03	14%	25 Aug →
vertigo	17–19	-0.03	20%	24 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	8%	24 Aug →
vertigo	16–13	0.04	19%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.05	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	22%	23 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.02	34%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	14%	22 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.01	5%	22 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	26%	21 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.02	20%	20 Aug →
vertigo	19–16	0.01	10%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	10%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	23%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	23%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	17%	19 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	0.02	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	22%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	12%	19 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.10	14%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	11%	18 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.01	13%	18 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.01	28%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	25%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.13	14%	18 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.06	12%	18 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.10	21%	10 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	12%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	12%	7 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.08	29%	5 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.08	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	20%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	18%	4 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.05	23%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.03	16%	2 Aug →
mirage	20–22	-0.02	19%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.00	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	3%	2 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	14%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	15%	1 Aug →
vertigo	6–2	-0.05	7%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	24%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	19%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.06	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	15%	30 Jul →
vertigo	16–13	-0.04	17%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.02	24%	30 Jul →
vertigo	16–14	-0.04	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	17%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.08	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	18%	28 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.06	28%	28 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	26%	28 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.06	24%	28 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.04	14%	28 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	0.06	16%	25 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	9%	25 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	17%	25 Jul →
vertigo	17–19	-0.02	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	25%	25 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	23%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	23%	24 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	23%	24 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.03	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	9%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.17	20%	19 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	33%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	16%	13 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	0.01	24%	13 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	17%	13 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.04	28%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	19%	12 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.12	21%	12 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	13%	11 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.03	13%	11 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	-0.06	10%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	8%	10 Jul →
vertigo	13–16	-0.03	33%	10 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.05	5%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	15%	10 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.09	22%	10 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	27%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.03	13%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	16%	9 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.05	15%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	22%	7 Jul →
vertigo	14–16	-0.01	18%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	19%	7 Jul →
vertigo	12–16	-0.04	10%	7 Jul →