Santan — CS2 Stats

76561199007233636[U:1:1046967908]✓ No bans

3,088Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning50

Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.8

Aggression3.8

Utility7.9

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning5.0

Utility7.9

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time543ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy25.5%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — vertigo 13–4

13–2Biggest win — anubis

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	B	34	17–17	50%	-0.01
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.00
vertigo	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
mirage	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.03
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,858Matches

53%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

80.8ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	227	54%	1.05	16.8
Anubis	184	53%	1.02	16.6
Vertigo	150	55%	1.09	17.7
Mirage	81	49%	1.06	15.6
Nuke	69	51%	0.95	15.9
Overpass	22	36%	0.94	15.7
Dust2	8	12%	0.83	13.9
Inferno	7	100%	1.36	16.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.3%Spray accuracy

78.9%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

547msReaction time

20.5%T opening success

46.6%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

16.2%Flash assists

8.48HE damage / grenade

7.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.5346% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.01	38%	13 Mar →
train	17–19	0.02	34%	20 Jan →
ancient	13–5	0.07	18%	13 Jan →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	19%	3 Jan →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	23%	11 Dec →
inferno	9–7	-0.05	17%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	28%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.09	27%	5 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.20	19%	1 Oct →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	31%	27 Sept →
nuke	15–15	0.12	38%	13 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.03	26%	4 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	0.05	30%	2 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	26%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	33%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.03	16%	27 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	23%	22 Apr →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	33%	17 Apr →
ancient	13–3	0.06	28%	17 Apr →
anubis	13–3	-0.05	21%	17 Apr →
anubis	0–13	-0.14	40%	7 Apr →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	29%	3 Apr →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	18%	3 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	35%	3 Apr →
overpass	14–16	-0.05	18%	3 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	11%	3 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	22%	18 Mar →
ancient	19–16	-0.04	18%	10 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.03	33%	9 Mar →
mirage	19–17	-0.01	21%	9 Mar →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	29%	9 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	20%	8 Mar →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	20%	8 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.03	35%	8 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.05	24%	8 Mar →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	27%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.05	20%	7 Mar →
anubis	12–16	0.08	31%	7 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	24%	7 Mar →
vertigo	13–4	0.06	21%	7 Mar →
vertigo	7–13	0.03	45%	6 Mar →
vertigo	13–7	-0.00	19%	6 Mar →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	16%	6 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.10	28%	6 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.02	22%	5 Mar →
anubis	13–3	0.02	17%	5 Mar →
vertigo	13–2	0.10	43%	5 Mar →
anubis	13–11	0.10	24%	5 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.12	44%	5 Mar →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	20%	4 Mar →
nuke	13–5	0.05	29%	4 Mar →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	30%	3 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.03	27%	3 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.02	31%	3 Mar →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	14%	2 Mar →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	28%	1 Mar →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	27%	1 Mar →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	27%	1 Mar →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	25%	1 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	33%	27 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	32%	26 Feb →
vertigo	8–13	0.07	42%	26 Feb →
anubis	4–13	0.01	28%	26 Feb →
anubis	15–19	-0.03	27%	26 Feb →
overpass	13–11	0.00	26%	26 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.09	19%	25 Feb →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	21%	24 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	44%	20 Feb →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	29%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	22%	19 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	22%	19 Feb →
anubis	11–13	0.05	25%	16 Feb →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	41%	16 Feb →
nuke	1–13	-0.10	20%	15 Feb →
anubis	4–13	-0.12	14%	14 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	15%	14 Feb →
overpass	13–9	0.00	20%	14 Feb →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	30%	9 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.09	28%	9 Feb →
anubis	19–15	-0.06	35%	9 Feb →
vertigo	8–13	0.01	25%	8 Feb →
vertigo	13–16	-0.02	23%	8 Feb →
vertigo	13–5	0.00	16%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.08	19%	8 Feb →
anubis	13–5	0.03	30%	8 Feb →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	38%	7 Feb →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	23%	7 Feb →
vertigo	13–11	-0.07	26%	7 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	36%	6 Feb →
vertigo	13–10	-0.03	30%	5 Feb →
overpass	7–13	-0.03	16%	3 Feb →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	31%	3 Feb →
vertigo	13–6	0.12	23%	2 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	37%	2 Feb →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	26%	2 Feb →
vertigo	13–10	0.02	15%	2 Feb →
overpass	12–16	-0.05	23%	1 Feb →
anubis	13–6	-0.06	24%	1 Feb →
nuke	16–14	-0.04	35%	1 Feb →
vertigo	4–13	0.03	28%	1 Feb →