c1trom — CS2 Stats

76561199005936332[U:1:1045670604]

549Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,229Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,308Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3775 of 33241 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,411 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	52.1%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	19.9%	12.3%	13.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	49.5%	46.3%	46.9%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning36

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression3.5

Utility6.5

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning3.6

Utility6.5

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time509ms−85ms

first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms

Headshot accuracy25.3%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–0Biggest win — dust2

13Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 36ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	39	19–20	49%	0.01
dust2	S	36	25–11	69%	-0.00
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.03
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,226Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players

3,193Matches

49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players

52.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players

19.9%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players

17,268MVPs

1,709Hours (in match)

2,362Bombs planted

2,690Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,495

Desert Eagle24,591

AWP20,473

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,507

P2000 / USP-S4,776

Glock-183,258

SG 5532,920

Galil AR1,307

SSG 081,286

FAMAS1,276

Lifetime map wins

13,611dust2

5,792inferno

1,226vertigo

807train

740nuke

266cbble

30dust

23lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

474Matches

56%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

86.0ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	48	58%	1.33	17.6
Dust2	29	59%	1.26	18.7
Anubis	11	64%	0.96	15.1
Ancient	7	71%	1.27	19.6
Cache	6	33%	0.98	16.0
Overpass	5	80%	1.54	22.0
Inferno	5	40%	1.27	16.0
Nuke	3	33%	1.20	18.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy

31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.7%Spray accuracy

83.0%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

511msReaction time

20.1%T opening success

36.9%CT opening success

0.83Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

7.53HE damage / grenade

16.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.1154% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	0–13	-0.09	0%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.00	29%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	27%	24 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	21%	24 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.02	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	24 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.03	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	0%	14 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	0%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	32%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.16	56%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.07	75%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	47%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	32%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	21%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	29%	11 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	27%	11 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	26%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	23%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	33%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.10	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	26%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	50%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	23%	2 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	19%	2 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	32%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.15	17%	2 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	40%	2 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	29%	2 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.11	25%	29 Jun →
overpass	13–1	0.06	21%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	14%	29 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	40%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.05	38%	29 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	41%	29 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	24%	29 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	55%	29 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	11%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.09	36%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.14	37%	21 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	29%	17 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	18%	7 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.04	33%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.12	48%	4 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.02	31%	1 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	18%	29 May →
dust2	13–8	0.07	38%	29 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	28%	23 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	55%	10 Apr →
dust2	0–13	-0.11	13%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.04	29%	19 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.05	13%	13 Mar →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	36%	13 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.07	29%	13 Mar →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	35%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.14	26%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.12	27%	26 Feb →
mirage	4–13	0.04	32%	25 Feb →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	24%	25 Feb →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	32%	24 Feb →
nuke	13–5	0.04	31%	23 Feb →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	17%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.03	28%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.09	29%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–16	0.03	29%	21 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.04	45%	21 Feb →
ancient	11–13	0.00	23%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	28%	21 Feb →
mirage	8–13	0.02	21%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.00	26%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.03	36%	13 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.04	26%	12 Feb →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	18%	12 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.04	33%	12 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	17%	12 Feb →
ancient	6–13	0.02	31%	12 Feb →
mirage	5–13	0.02	28%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.00	24%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	12%	9 Feb →
mirage	14–16	0.00	22%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.02	26%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.06	24%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	12%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.04	31%	6 Feb →
ancient	13–9	0.07	29%	6 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.04	31%	6 Feb →
dust2	6–0	0.05	50%	6 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.03	41%	6 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.01	22%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.01	14%	29 Jan →
ancient	13–9	0.00	19%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–16	0.01	27%	28 Jan →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	10%	28 Jan →
dust2	11–13	0.00	40%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.11	27%	24 Jan →