Mad — CS2 Stats

76561199001378337[U:1:1041112609]

3,728Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,508Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10299 of 20047 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,193 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMadFACEITLevel 5 · 1,193 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,508 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning43
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression4.4
Utility5.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time596ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29161355%0.00
ancientC1881044%0.01
dust2B179853%-0.00
anubisB115645%-0.03
nukeA106460%0.02
infernoD93633%-0.02
cacheB63350%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
56%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
84.5ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.0415.6
Ancient757%1.1418.9
Nuke683%1.0217.5
Anubis4100%1.2019.8
Inferno20%0.7112.0
Overpass2100%2.2011.5
Dust210%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
88.7%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
590msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
14.31HE damage / grenade
5.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4552 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9382% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.098%23 Aug
mirage13–20.0332%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0019%23 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0111%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0133%23 Aug
dust213–40.0833%23 Aug
ancient7–130.0633%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0416%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0728%22 Aug
dust24–130.0226%22 Aug
ancient16–140.0627%22 Aug
anubis8–130.0533%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0121%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0320%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0226%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0417%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0222%19 Aug
cache13–50.0831%19 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0219%19 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0327%18 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0821%18 Aug
dust29–130.0116%18 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0525%18 Aug
cache11–130.0018%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0522%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0427%16 Aug
dust213–80.0426%10 Aug
cache11–130.0645%10 Aug
dust213–100.0125%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0331%10 Aug
ancient6–130.0728%10 Aug
mirage13–160.0127%10 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0024%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0717%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0124%9 Aug
dust213–110.0729%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0941%9 Aug
nuke13–40.0532%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.1022%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0135%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0222%9 Aug
nuke7–130.0129%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0426%9 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0127%10 Jul
nuke13–70.0715%10 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0115%10 Jul
inferno7–130.0536%10 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0025%10 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0122%10 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0019%10 Jul
ancient9–10.0122%10 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0317%10 Jul
cache9–13-0.0426%10 Jul
dust211–13-0.0622%10 Jul
cache13–3-0.0022%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0515%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0539%10 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0417%10 Jul
mirage6–130.0340%10 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0123%10 Jul
mirage13–40.0827%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0140%5 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0316%5 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0619%5 Jul
dust213–5-0.0131%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0417%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0524%5 Jul
ancient9–130.0325%4 Jul
dust210–13-0.0436%4 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0626%4 Jul
mirage13–160.0023%4 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0121%4 Jul
mirage9–130.0140%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0319%3 Jul
dust27–13-0.0315%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0536%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0116%3 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0442%3 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0226%3 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0316%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0223%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0228%3 Jul
ancient13–70.0322%3 Jul
dust213–30.0330%3 Jul
mirage5–130.0235%3 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0231%3 Jul
ancient5–130.0629%3 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0318%1 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0925%1 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0023%1 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0124%1 Jul
anubis9–130.0231%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0713%1 Jul
dust26–13-0.0639%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0124%1 Jul
ancient10–130.0120%1 Jul
nuke9–10.0321%1 Jul
anubis13–90.0328%1 Jul
mirage13–60.0628%1 Jul
anubis12–16-0.1120%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →