NO hard feelings — CS2 Stats

76561198988520407[U:1:1028254679]

1,500Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,176 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning60

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression7.8

Utility4.5

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning6.0

Utility4.5

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time606ms+28ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–0Biggest win — anubis

8Longest win streak

14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 25overpassWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	25	17–8	68%	0.05
ancient	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
mirage	A	16	9–7	56%	0.04
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	0.04
dust2	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
whistle	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

813Matches

52%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

70.8ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	145	48%	1.18	15.3
Inferno	91	52%	1.13	14.8
Ancient	80	48%	1.06	15.0
Vertigo	77	55%	1.41	17.7
Anubis	69	55%	1.16	16.1
Overpass	46	57%	1.18	16.0
Dust2	44	64%	0.91	12.9
Nuke	36	58%	1.22	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.9%Spray accuracy

85.5%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

599msReaction time

33.8%T opening success

51.4%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

7.34HE damage / grenade

9.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4566 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.7561% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.02	17%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.08	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	10 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.03	25%	8 May →
nuke	13–5	0.03	26%	12 Dec →
train	6–13	-0.05	5%	9 Nov →
ancient	13–3	0.03	12%	7 Nov →
mirage	13–6	0.02	10%	7 Nov →
ancient	9–13	0.01	17%	19 Oct →
overpass	9–13	-0.03	24%	18 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	8%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.08	16%	9 Oct →
overpass	13–9	0.04	17%	9 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	14%	7 Oct →
inferno	4–13	0.02	20%	7 Oct →
mirage	5–13	0.00	24%	6 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.06	19%	6 Oct →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	16%	26 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.01	10%	20 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	12%	20 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	17%	9 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	11%	9 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.01	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	15%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.11	19%	6 Aug →
overpass	7–13	-0.04	12%	2 Aug →
overpass	13–10	0.05	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	10%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	14%	16 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	7%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.04	16%	12 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.02	9%	19 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.06	14%	18 Jan →
anubis	3–13	0.05	15%	10 Jan →
nuke	22–20	0.01	14%	20 Dec →
inferno	12–16	0.01	12%	18 Dec →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	18%	8 Dec →
ancient	19–17	-0.04	12%	28 Nov →
ancient	7–13	0.04	21%	26 Nov →
ancient	8–13	0.00	20%	25 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	16%	24 Nov →
anubis	6–13	0.04	33%	24 Nov →
nuke	13–5	0.11	33%	24 Nov →
whistle	3–9	-0.21	6%	24 Nov →
inferno	5–9	-0.12	23%	24 Nov →
inferno	9–4	0.10	15%	24 Nov →
inferno	9–6	0.10	18%	24 Nov →
ancient	8–13	0.01	15%	24 Nov →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	22%	21 Nov →
mirage	11–13	0.02	12%	20 Nov →
inferno	13–4	0.23	31%	20 Nov →
inferno	13–9	0.01	13%	20 Nov →
dust2	13–16	0.03	16%	20 Nov →
inferno	13–16	0.01	28%	17 Nov →
inferno	13–5	0.06	31%	17 Nov →
anubis	13–6	0.07	15%	17 Nov →
ancient	13–4	0.05	22%	17 Nov →
ancient	13–4	0.17	15%	16 Nov →
anubis	13–4	0.13	11%	16 Nov →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	12%	14 Nov →
inferno	13–3	0.05	19%	14 Nov →
ancient	7–13	0.04	17%	14 Nov →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	11%	13 Nov →
inferno	13–4	0.18	25%	13 Nov →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	24%	13 Nov →
mirage	13–2	0.04	15%	13 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.04	16%	12 Nov →
nuke	13–4	0.04	20%	12 Nov →
dust2	12–16	0.01	17%	12 Nov →
mirage	13–8	0.13	27%	10 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.10	15%	10 Nov →
inferno	13–6	0.02	23%	10 Nov →
inferno	13–10	0.06	30%	10 Nov →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	10%	8 Nov →
vertigo	6–13	0.06	13%	8 Nov →
mirage	7–13	0.07	14%	8 Nov →
anubis	11–13	0.06	14%	6 Nov →
inferno	2–13	-0.00	17%	4 Nov →
anubis	13–4	0.05	14%	4 Nov →
inferno	16–14	0.07	20%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.08	15%	29 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.05	18%	29 Oct →
inferno	9–13	0.04	20%	28 Oct →
anubis	13–0	0.03	23%	28 Oct →
mirage	16–14	0.02	11%	27 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	17%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.13	16%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–16	0.03	13%	27 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.02	21%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.03	17%	27 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	14%	25 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.16	18%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.02	14%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.00	22%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.11	11%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.05	31%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.04	22%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.12	18%	28 Jul →
vertigo	16–13	0.00	15%	28 Jul →