Førgøtten

Førgøtten — CS2 Stats

AU76561198986940242[U:1:1026674514]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,039Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 Solid
Premier CS Rating25,123Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1472 of 9414 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFørgøttenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,123 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51454Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression6.0
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch5.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time610ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 9–13
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%-0.01
infernoB179853%-0.01
ancientC167944%-0.01
nukeD124833%-0.01
dust2A127558%-0.01
anubisC114736%0.00
cacheS550100%-0.01
overpass21150%-0.01
shelter110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
56%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
77.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4347%0.9615.6
Ancient2259%1.0316.9
Anubis2070%1.0317.0
Vertigo1567%1.0716.5
Inferno956%1.0016.3
Nuke862%0.9215.6
Dust2850%0.7813.3
Overpass333%0.8419.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
616msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
12.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7935% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0222%19 Jul
cache13–70.0318%19 Jul
mirage13–50.0416%19 Jul
ancient13–40.0727%13 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0615%13 Jul
ancient10–13-0.079%13 Jul
nuke15–150.0018%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0419%13 Jul
inferno13–160.0111%13 Jul
mirage13–80.0315%13 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0522%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0817%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0115%12 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0416%12 Jul
inferno16–140.0023%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0321%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.079%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0611%12 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0717%11 Jul
inferno13–70.0321%11 Jul
cache13–8-0.0212%11 Jul
ancient13–4-0.019%11 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0321%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0413%11 Jul
ancient13–60.0217%11 Jul
anubis9–130.0211%11 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1019%11 Jul
cache13–8-0.0416%11 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0420%11 Jul
dust213–110.0014%11 Jul
shelter13–4-0.0419%10 Jul
cache13–70.0223%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0213%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0035%10 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0523%10 Jul
anubis13–40.0022%24 Jun
nuke13–80.0310%24 Jun
dust213–11-0.0210%23 Jun
dust213–11-0.0216%23 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0126%23 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0018%20 Jun
dust29–130.0924%20 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0113%20 Jun
nuke8–130.0313%20 Jun
anubis5–13-0.072%20 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0520%19 Jun
anubis13–50.0317%19 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0521%19 Jun
ancient13–60.0530%19 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0217%19 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0422%19 Jun
overpass13–80.0122%19 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0713%19 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0021%19 Jun
ancient9–130.0224%19 Jun
mirage2–00.000%16 Jun
dust213–90.0318%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0426%16 Jun
dust216–120.0126%16 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0120%16 Jun
mirage13–8-0.097%16 Jun
mirage2–13-0.068%16 Jun
dust213–50.0114%15 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0114%15 Jun
anubis13–90.0327%15 Jun
mirage7–130.0215%15 Jun
dust28–13-0.0512%15 Jun
anubis13–160.0021%15 Jun
nuke11–130.0729%15 Jun
inferno10–130.0319%14 Jun
ancient13–90.0419%14 Jun
dust213–10-0.0224%13 Jun
inferno13–60.0124%13 Jun
mirage13–40.0639%13 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0320%13 Jun
mirage13–10.0632%13 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0322%13 Jun
mirage15–150.0314%13 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0322%13 Jun
mirage13–70.0630%13 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0315%13 Jun
mirage4–130.0116%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0512%13 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0312%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0311%13 Jun
inferno13–8-0.048%11 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0118%11 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0017%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0620%11 Jun
dust213–16-0.0322%11 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0914%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0519%7 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0410%7 Jun
anubis13–160.0422%7 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0721%7 Jun
ancient13–10.0117%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0725%7 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0329%7 Jun
anubis5–130.0244%7 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0520%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →