Cozmo — CS2 Stats

76561198985260426[U:1:1024994698]

3,993Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,553Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5443 of 12969 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,437 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,553Peak Premier on CSDB
1,437Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,437
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 94 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,553
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,447 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCozmoFACEITLevel 6 · 1,437 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,553 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,437csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning53
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLWWWTWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression6.2
Utility6.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time602ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 11infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.02
ancientA2112957%0.01
dust2B147750%-0.01
anubisC125742%-0.02
nukeS119282%0.05
infernoD102820%-0.01
cacheA85363%0.00
vertigo110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

800Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
79.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21650%1.0716.2
Ancient11151%1.1416.4
Anubis10450%1.0716.4
Inferno9247%1.0715.9
Dust27651%1.1415.2
Nuke6244%1.0516.2
Vertigo5558%1.1015.8
Train862%1.0017.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
605msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
11.16HE damage / grenade
8.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.4196% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0620%28 Aug
mirage7–1-0.0325%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0117%25 Aug
ancient13–70.0017%24 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0620%24 Aug
dust213–100.0226%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0314%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0221%23 Aug
dust28–130.0328%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0618%23 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0617%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0616%15 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0217%15 Aug
nuke16–140.0733%14 Aug
mirage3–130.0335%14 Aug
inferno11–13-0.055%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.026%14 Aug
vertigo13–5-0.0411%13 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0126%13 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0720%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0316%12 Aug
cache6–13-0.039%12 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0016%12 Aug
nuke13–110.057%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0417%10 Aug
cache13–7-0.0215%10 Aug
cache13–110.0121%10 Aug
mirage13–50.0623%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0820%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0014%10 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0318%10 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0312%10 Aug
cache13–9-0.0616%10 Aug
dust213–100.0619%10 Aug
nuke11–130.0113%10 Aug
nuke13–80.038%10 Aug
ancient2–13-0.068%10 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0211%10 Aug
ancient13–90.0719%10 Aug
cache16–120.0414%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0213%10 Aug
dust213–4-0.017%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0716%9 Aug
ancient13–60.0126%9 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0511%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0221%9 Aug
anubis16–130.0510%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0314%8 Aug
mirage12–160.0823%8 Aug
cache8–130.0312%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0318%8 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0110%8 Aug
nuke13–80.148%8 Aug
ancient13–50.1110%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0411%8 Aug
inferno6–130.0318%8 Aug
mirage13–20.1621%8 Aug
ancient13–80.1417%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0724%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0117%8 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0115%8 Aug
inferno4–130.089%8 Aug
dust213–16-0.0310%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0310%8 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0115%8 Aug
ancient16–130.0516%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0321%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0014%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0413%7 Aug
cache9–13-0.0116%7 Aug
dust213–70.039%7 Aug
nuke13–80.0417%7 Aug
nuke13–160.0310%7 Aug
dust213–160.0113%7 Aug
mirage13–60.0912%7 Aug
inferno7–13-0.059%7 Aug
nuke13–20.0616%6 Aug
ancient9–130.0112%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0714%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.088%5 Aug
ancient10–130.0013%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0512%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0418%5 Aug
dust214–16-0.0310%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.077%4 Aug
cache13–80.0716%4 Aug
inferno13–40.0415%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0419%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0411%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0314%4 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0222%4 Aug
dust213–60.0115%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0214%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0720%3 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0117%3 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0711%3 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0719%3 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0412%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0015%2 Aug
mirage6–30.0121%2 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →