BORNK

BORNK — CS2 Stats

US76561198981904250[U:1:1021638522]Steam profile ↗

1,138Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,408Purple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3431 of 7001 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBORNKFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,408 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning59
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateWWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression8.5
Utility4.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.9
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time550ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 61% over 18dust2Weakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2381535%-0.00
mirageB21101148%-0.01
cacheA1811761%0.03
ancientC114736%-0.00
anubisB105550%0.01
nukeA95456%0.02
infernoC52340%-0.00
vertigo32167%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

336Matches
48%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
84.1ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11453%1.1617.4
Dust28549%1.1617.3
Ancient3330%1.0216.5
Anubis3250%1.3117.6
Nuke2446%1.0616.0
Cache2348%1.2617.5
Vertigo1323%1.1116.2
Inferno1258%1.0015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
538msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
5.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4665 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0673% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0229%28 Aug
mirage13–30.0226%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0622%25 Aug
nuke13–30.0144%25 Aug
cache13–80.0415%24 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0234%22 Aug
dust214–160.0320%21 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0517%21 Aug
mirage20–220.0120%21 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0124%16 Aug
dust29–130.0035%16 Aug
cache16–130.0836%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0514%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0428%14 Aug
cache8–130.0244%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0350%14 Aug
cache13–60.0622%13 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0217%11 Aug
mirage4–130.0214%9 Aug
cache7–130.0423%8 Aug
dust214–160.0626%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0720%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0121%8 Aug
ancient9–130.0129%7 Aug
vertigo13–60.0545%7 Aug
vertigo13–110.0226%5 Aug
mirage13–40.1028%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0622%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0213%2 Aug
vertigo11–130.0457%1 Aug
anubis13–100.0315%1 Aug
dust29–130.0326%31 Jul
cache11–130.0420%31 Jul
dust214–16-0.0227%31 Jul
cache13–100.0539%30 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0234%30 Jul
nuke13–70.0636%30 Jul
cache13–90.0840%28 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0220%28 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0123%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0246%26 Jul
dust215–150.0533%26 Jul
cache13–60.0230%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0424%24 Jul
cache16–13-0.0022%24 Jul
ancient0–2-0.060%24 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0018%24 Jul
dust213–9-0.0315%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0713%24 Jul
dust213–70.0522%19 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0518%18 Jul
cache2–13-0.0535%17 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0612%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0519%17 Jul
dust213–80.0021%17 Jul
anubis13–110.0524%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0121%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0513%17 Jul
cache13–7-0.0015%16 Jul
anubis13–100.0240%16 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0710%16 Jul
cache11–130.0317%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0215%16 Jul
dust213–50.0719%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0617%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0226%15 Jul
cache13–11-0.0420%14 Jul
dust213–70.0234%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0617%14 Jul
ancient7–130.0223%14 Jul
dust213–7-0.0830%12 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0711%12 Jul
anubis13–100.0227%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0111%12 Jul
dust213–100.0826%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.056%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0020%11 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0335%11 Jul
ancient17–19-0.0310%11 Jul
anubis8–130.0515%10 Jul
dust25–130.0338%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0229%10 Jul
nuke13–110.1219%10 Jul
cache13–40.0115%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0244%10 Jul
dust213–20.0629%10 Jul
anubis13–80.0427%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0920%10 Jul
inferno13–20.1643%10 Jul
mirage11–130.0838%9 Jul
cache7–130.0034%9 Jul
mirage0–13-0.070%9 Jul
mirage13–160.0925%9 Jul
dust215–15-0.0420%9 Jul
nuke16–120.1432%9 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0830%9 Jul
cache13–40.1423%8 Jul
dust28–130.0115%8 Jul
ancient11–130.0514%7 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0225%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →