TTP | pbgtl007 — CS2 Stats

76561198980861002[U:1:1020595274]

418Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim57

Positioning61

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateLLWWLTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7

Aggression7.5

Utility5.1

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7

Positioning6.1

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time635ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms

Headshot accuracy23.8%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–4Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	0.05
dust2	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
mirage	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
nuke	C	13	5–8	38%	0.01
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	0.02
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.05
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	0.07
poseidon	—	3	3–0	100%	0.07
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

104Matches

54%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

83.3ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	28	61%	1.40	18.7
Ancient	21	57%	1.16	16.1
Mirage	20	50%	1.17	15.9
Nuke	13	69%	1.08	17.5
Anubis	12	50%	1.13	17.0
Inferno	4	25%	0.97	16.8
Cache	2	0%	1.02	15.5
Overpass	1	100%	1.11	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy

33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.2%Spray accuracy

76.6%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

661msReaction time

39.9%T opening success

45.9%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

11.70HE damage / grenade

9.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4951 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.9322% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–9	0.03	20%	21 Jul →
nuke	7–9	0.03	12%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.15	24%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.11	27%	21 Jul →
anubis	6–11	0.03	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.00	20%	3 Jul →
vertigo	6–9	-0.05	32%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.20	21%	3 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	19%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	25%	1 Jul →
inferno	7–9	-0.07	16%	1 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.21	32%	1 Jul →
overpass	7–9	0.04	26%	1 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.03	35%	30 Jun →
nuke	9–6	0.02	33%	30 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.01	44%	30 Jun →
sanctum	5–9	-0.15	11%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.14	24%	30 Jun →
nuke	8–8	0.18	20%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	24%	29 Jun →
nuke	2–9	-0.04	16%	24 Jun →
inferno	4–9	0.07	40%	24 Jun →
overpass	6–9	0.07	28%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.15	33%	22 Jun →
poseidon	9–6	0.06	18%	22 Jun →
vertigo	9–7	0.17	20%	22 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.00	17%	11 Jun →
inferno	2–9	-0.13	30%	11 Jun →
ancient	4–0	-0.02	0%	12 May →
cache	11–13	-0.05	9%	6 May →
cache	3–13	-0.07	28%	6 May →
cache	13–8	-0.00	29%	4 May →
dust2	13–6	0.06	31%	4 May →
dust2	13–10	0.06	28%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.08	11%	22 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	34%	17 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.01	16%	17 Apr →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	21%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–16	0.03	22%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.00	22%	16 Apr →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	12%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	33%	15 Apr →
anubis	6–13	0.07	21%	15 Apr →
anubis	7–13	0.04	26%	15 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	18%	15 Apr →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	17%	15 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	39%	15 Apr →
nuke	9–4	0.06	19%	14 Apr →
inferno	8–8	-0.09	32%	14 Apr →
poseidon	9–4	-0.06	22%	14 Apr →
vertigo	9–3	0.16	14%	14 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	29%	14 Apr →
vertigo	8–8	0.02	16%	10 Apr →
nuke	9–6	-0.05	13%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–6	0.07	10%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–3	0.06	16%	10 Apr →
vertigo	9–5	-0.03	25%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–0	0.18	33%	10 Apr →
inferno	9–1	0.21	15%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.02	17%	10 Apr →
dust2	5–13	0.10	32%	8 Apr →
anubis	5–13	0.02	17%	8 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.03	14%	8 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.07	21%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	23%	29 Mar →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	5%	29 Mar →
anubis	8–13	0.01	25%	29 Mar →
nuke	12–16	0.01	21%	29 Mar →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	30%	29 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	36%	28 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	13%	28 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	18%	23 Mar →
overpass	10–13	0.05	18%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.07	25%	21 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	8%	21 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	9%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.07	23%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.11	24%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	30%	14 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.09	31%	13 Mar →
ancient	13–11	0.08	23%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	24%	12 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	16%	11 Mar →
ancient	13–4	0.09	21%	10 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	33%	10 Mar →
mirage	17–19	-0.02	6%	8 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.04	32%	7 Mar →
inferno	8–13	0.02	17%	6 Mar →
overpass	6–13	0.09	23%	1 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	15%	1 Mar →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	19%	1 Mar →
dust2	13–8	0.03	24%	1 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	22%	19 Feb →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	16%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.07	15%	18 Feb →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	29%	18 Feb →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	15%	18 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	18%	18 Feb →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	17%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.02	26%	18 Feb →