Trix — CS2 Stats

US76561198974658100[U:1:1014392372]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,558Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating7,752Light Blue band · top ~65.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12641 of 16805 tracked

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47

Positioning48

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–49–7Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7

Aggression3.3

Utility3.7

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7

Positioning4.8

Utility3.7

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact6.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time668ms−5ms

first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms

Headshot accuracy14.6%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — poseidon 9–1

13–2Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	23	8–15	35%	-0.01
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	-0.02
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.01
ancient	S	13	10–3	77%	0.01
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.03
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.00
inferno	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.03
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.20
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

110Matches

36%Win rate

0.87Avg K/D

65.3ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	3	33%	0.68	9.7
Nuke	2	0%	0.62	9.5
Inferno	1	100%	0.90	19.0
Mirage	1	0%	1.53	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy

33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

13.5°Preaim

660msReaction time

30.4%T opening success

45.3%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

12.3%Flash assists

8.73HE damage / grenade

4.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.4743° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.4971% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4811 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–10	0.04	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	19%	26 Aug →
office	13–7	-0.06	8%	26 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.11	9%	25 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	9%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	17%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.08	12%	22 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	16%	22 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	12%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.06	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.03	24%	21 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	15%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.02	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	9%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.10	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	17%	20 Aug →
poseidon	9–1	0.20	33%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	4%	18 Aug →
nuke	3–5	0.02	14%	18 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.00	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.04	20%	17 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	9%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.00	12%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.08	7%	13 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	8%	13 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	7%	13 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.04	14%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	11%	12 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	11%	11 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.06	11%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	17%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	18%	11 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	24%	10 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	28%	10 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	9%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	3%	30 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.00	19%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	4%	30 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.12	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	7%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	12%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.03	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.03	10%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.00	22%	28 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.20	14%	28 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.10	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	15%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.06	15%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.07	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	4%	23 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.02	12%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	8%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	9%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	3%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	14%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	10%	22 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	18%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	9%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	9%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	14%	20 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	9%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.11	3%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.01	13%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	7%	16 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	10%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	11%	16 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.11	19%	16 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.05	20%	16 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	29%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	33%	12 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.02	14%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	13%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	0–6	-0.04	0%	12 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	13%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	9%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	11%	9 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	20%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	7%	9 Jul →