Huntr- — CS2 Stats

76561198969847430[U:1:1009581702]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,856Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,033Hours in CS121Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,149Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9630 of 27529 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,440 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	60.4%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	12.4%	12.3%	13.1%	0.6% short
Kill/death ratio	1.18	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	48.2%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning55

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression7.1

Utility4.2

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.5

Utility4.2

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time531ms−50ms

first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms

Headshot accuracy22.6%−1.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13cacheWeakest map · 42% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	19	10–9	53%	0.03
cache	C	19	8–11	42%	0.03
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.05
ancient	A	12	7–5	58%	0.02
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	0.04
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

112,194Lifetime kills

1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players

4,954Matches

48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

60.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players

12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

19,155MVPs

2,052Hours (in match)

4,491Bombs planted

1,323Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,895

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,436

Desert Eagle10,538

AWP9,615

P2000 / USP-S5,980

Glock-183,896

MP91,433

Galil AR1,431

FAMAS1,407

SSG 081,181

Lifetime map wins

5,350inferno

5,187dust2

4,619nuke

3,775vertigo

2,515train

224office

100cbble

51lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

319Matches

52%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

96.7ADR

60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	66	42%	1.24	20.1
Vertigo	40	65%	1.52	22.3
Ancient	38	61%	1.30	20.4
Anubis	37	54%	1.34	21.4
Nuke	24	75%	1.42	18.9
Inferno	22	45%	1.27	19.6
Dust2	18	56%	1.29	17.1
Cache	8	50%	1.12	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.8%Spray accuracy

83.6%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

531msReaction time

29.5%T opening success

61.0%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

6.75HE damage / grenade

7.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	0.00	21%	29 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	22%	26 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.04	27%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	13%	25 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	13%	24 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	28%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	26%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	38%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	27%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	29%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.01	15%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	20%	22 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.13	25%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.13	28%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.03	22%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	14%	19 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	13%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.07	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	40%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	32%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	24%	17 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.02	35%	16 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.06	17%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	37%	15 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	33%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	25%	15 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.07	30%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	37%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	20%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	24%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	24%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.02	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.14	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	23%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	17%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	16%	13 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	14%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	22%	13 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	28%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	14%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	25%	13 Aug →
cache	0–11	0.01	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	30%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.09	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.13	31%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	22%	13 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.01	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.09	21%	13 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	33%	13 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	27%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	32%	12 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	28%	12 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.06	26%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	32%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.09	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	27%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	40%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	19%	11 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	24%	10 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.10	22%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.05	25%	10 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.06	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.10	21%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	22%	9 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.15	28%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.05	28%	9 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.02	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.11	15%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.07	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.08	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	23%	8 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	31%	8 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.06	19%	7 Aug →