Emmisen♡

Emmisen♡ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198964326202[U:1:1004060474]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,805Tracked matches38%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,508Blue band · top ~52.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10146 of 13960 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmmisen♡FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER10,508 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning37
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46513Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression2.8
Utility1.5
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning3.7
Utility1.5
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time622ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 36infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA36201656%-0.02
dust2C2081240%-0.01
cacheB137654%0.01
ancientC125742%-0.00
infernoD62433%-0.04
nukeC52340%0.01
anubis31233%-0.02
poseidon21150%-0.13
debris2020%0.02
overpass1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches
47%Win rate
0.48Avg K/D
46.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2040%0.458.2
Ancient667%0.7210.0
Nuke650%0.427.8
Dust2560%0.469.2
Cache450%0.447.8
Anubis250%0.406.0
Overpass10%0.508.0
Inferno10%0.5310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
625msReaction time
21.9%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.24Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
4.59HE damage / grenade
1.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7119% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.236 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.9188% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0611%24 Aug
dust213–90.0110%24 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0411%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0610%19 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0515%18 Aug
cache5–13-0.075%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0620%17 Aug
cache13–7-0.059%17 Aug
ancient11–13-0.116%17 Aug
ancient7–130.0720%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0221%17 Aug
dust213–50.2632%16 Aug
mirage13–40.1413%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.1114%15 Aug
mirage13–80.1921%15 Aug
dust213–80.0621%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.103%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0614%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.120%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0719%13 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0815%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.137%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.107%12 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0814%12 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0618%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0521%12 Aug
dust214–16-0.0415%12 Aug
mirage10–13-0.1421%12 Aug
dust214–16-0.0813%11 Aug
mirage5–13-0.096%11 Aug
dust23–13-0.0615%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0211%10 Aug
mirage13–100.0720%10 Aug
ancient13–00.1014%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0923%9 Aug
cache1–70.1135%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0021%8 Aug
mirage13–70.0121%8 Aug
inferno13–100.0817%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0319%8 Aug
dust213–80.1627%7 Aug
mirage13–40.1118%7 Aug
ancient13–70.1823%7 Aug
poseidon6–9-0.2116%7 Aug
debris4–9-0.039%7 Aug
debris8–80.0721%7 Aug
inferno8–8-0.024%7 Aug
cache3–13-0.0910%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0115%6 Aug
nuke13–70.1219%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0123%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1115%6 Aug
overpass1–13-0.1111%6 Aug
inferno2–9-0.120%6 Aug
poseidon9–7-0.0419%6 Aug
dust22–13-0.0118%5 Aug
cache16–13-0.0515%5 Aug
cache2–13-0.0819%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0025%5 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0619%5 Aug
dust21–13-0.110%4 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0217%4 Aug
cache13–16-0.0020%4 Aug
ancient13–40.1019%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0911%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0424%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.078%4 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0714%4 Aug
mirage16–14-0.123%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0318%3 Aug
dust213–50.1212%2 Aug
mirage16–130.0815%2 Aug
cache13–70.0615%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.1019%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0714%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0410%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0518%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0116%2 Aug
nuke10–13-0.093%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0516%2 Aug
anubis7–13-0.105%2 Aug
cache13–4-0.059%1 Aug
dust213–10-0.0415%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0929%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.0420%1 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0913%1 Aug
mirage13–0-0.056%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.087%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.118%1 Aug
dust213–3-0.0133%1 Aug
mirage13–80.1014%1 Aug
mirage13–40.1211%1 Aug
anubis13–60.1226%1 Aug
mirage12–160.0615%31 Jul
dust213–30.1720%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0014%31 Jul
cache13–100.1111%31 Jul
nuke8–130.1017%31 Jul
cache13–80.1213%31 Jul
cache13–30.1912%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →