ChiCaLu

ChiCaLu — CS2 Stats

76561198962517396[U:1:1002251668]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,296Tracked matches28%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChiCaLuFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning44
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37603Last 10037%Win rateLLLWLWLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression7.3
Utility3.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 725ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.4
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time732ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 707ms → last ⅓ avg 732ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — train 13–5
133Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 9dust2Weakest map · 19% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32141844%0.00
dust2D2141719%-0.00
infernoD2051525%0.01
nukeA95456%0.02
ancientC94544%-0.00
anubisD62433%0.03
train220100%0.05
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

628Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
75.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18446%1.0415.2
Inferno13446%0.9514.7
Dust28659%1.0614.9
Anubis8149%0.9314.3
Ancient5951%0.9414.8
Nuke3741%1.0115.7
Train2065%1.1016.1
Vertigo1662%1.0415.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
725msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
5.98HE damage / grenade
2.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 724.6438ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4602 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7342% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0220%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0324%1 Aug
dust28–130.0425%30 Jul
dust213–10-0.0516%25 Jul
dust211–130.1324%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0119%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.0416%3 Jul
dust27–13-0.0036%25 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0118%21 Jun
anubis15–150.0930%20 Jun
mirage4–130.0235%12 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0123%12 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0321%9 Jun
mirage8–130.0417%8 Jun
dust28–130.0027%5 Jun
mirage13–110.0923%27 May
inferno13–40.1038%24 May
nuke13–100.0416%23 May
inferno6–130.0324%23 May
inferno10–130.0923%9 May
inferno7–130.0418%6 May
mirage1–9-0.0439%3 May
mirage8–13-0.0428%29 Apr
nuke13–40.0243%1 Apr
ancient8–13-0.058%1 Apr
dust211–13-0.0127%28 Mar
dust213–160.0128%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0123%21 Mar
dust23–130.0431%20 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0529%20 Mar
mirage13–110.0720%19 Mar
dust27–13-0.0122%18 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0426%14 Mar
dust24–13-0.0314%13 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0421%13 Mar
anubis13–110.0129%6 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0511%5 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0322%3 Mar
mirage7–130.0016%3 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0016%1 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0025%28 Feb
anubis7–130.0838%28 Feb
mirage12–16-0.0121%28 Feb
nuke15–150.0414%27 Feb
dust211–13-0.0714%26 Feb
dust213–90.0631%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0117%24 Feb
mirage7–130.0438%24 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0415%21 Feb
nuke13–80.0816%21 Feb
mirage13–70.0421%18 Feb
dust28–13-0.0230%17 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0321%17 Feb
mirage13–40.0031%17 Feb
nuke13–110.0527%17 Feb
mirage13–80.0117%16 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0222%15 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0256%13 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0120%13 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0133%2 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0129%30 Sept
nuke9–130.0018%30 Sept
inferno15–150.0831%30 Sept
overpass13–90.0424%30 Sept
dust213–16-0.0435%26 Sept
ancient9–130.0722%19 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0511%17 Sept
mirage11–130.0024%17 Sept
dust211–13-0.0334%24 Aug
inferno3–130.0122%21 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0132%15 Aug
train13–50.1528%15 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0423%10 Aug
inferno2–130.0018%9 Aug
mirage13–40.0728%28 Jul
mirage13–50.0436%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0213%24 Jul
inferno9–130.0519%12 Jul
dust213–60.0020%11 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0029%7 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0511%6 Jul
dust28–13-0.0633%2 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0323%2 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1228%30 Jun
inferno7–130.0132%30 Jun
dust213–90.0138%30 Jun
mirage13–80.0620%30 Jun
anubis13–90.0521%29 Jun
train13–9-0.0527%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0523%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0311%28 Jun
ancient16–120.0630%28 Jun
ancient13–60.0124%28 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0421%28 Jun
anubis10–130.0625%27 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0314%27 Jun
inferno13–110.0319%27 Jun
ancient13–80.0118%27 Jun
mirage7–13-0.056%24 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0033%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →