Camila Maionese

Camila Maionese — CS2 Stats

PT76561198951938596[U:1:991672868]Steam profile ↗

1,818Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,189Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3972 of 20778 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,110 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCamila MaioneseFACEITLevel 9 · 2,110 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,189 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning59
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression7.6
Utility3.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.9
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — nuke 13–6
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34161847%0.01
nukeC1871139%0.00
anubisA1710759%-0.00
ancientB158753%0.01
cacheA74357%-0.01
dust2A53260%0.02
inferno41325%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,120Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
82.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17754%1.2616.9
Anubis6851%1.3419.1
Ancient6349%1.3517.2
Nuke5760%1.4519.0
Inferno4353%1.3016.9
Dust23142%1.0115.1
Vertigo911%1.0016.0
Train757%1.0616.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
563msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
6.58HE damage / grenade
3.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3938 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.9539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0522%28 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0211%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0226%28 Aug
ancient13–30.0526%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0124%28 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0224%28 Aug
inferno13–160.0017%28 Aug
anubis7–130.0422%27 Aug
dust22–13-0.0614%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.078%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0324%27 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0620%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0626%27 Aug
nuke13–60.0114%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0318%27 Aug
nuke15–150.0620%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0217%23 Aug
mirage5–20.0220%23 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0322%23 Aug
nuke12–16-0.017%23 Aug
ancient8–130.0520%23 Aug
mirage13–80.0711%22 Aug
mirage7–10.0250%22 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0317%22 Aug
inferno6–130.0016%22 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0223%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.030%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0620%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0718%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0717%20 Aug
ancient2–7-0.0315%20 Aug
mirage13–90.0617%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0022%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0214%17 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0610%17 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0422%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.038%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0115%16 Aug
mirage13–30.0810%15 Aug
dust213–100.1222%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0324%15 Aug
ancient13–50.009%14 Aug
nuke8–130.0427%14 Aug
mirage13–50.0629%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.0218%13 Aug
inferno13–10.1112%13 Aug
ancient13–30.0618%13 Aug
mirage13–80.0314%13 Aug
ancient13–60.1011%13 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1020%11 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0219%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0018%10 Aug
mirage8–130.0426%10 Aug
nuke2–00.0750%10 Aug
anubis13–70.0117%9 Aug
dust216–120.0224%9 Aug
nuke4–130.0022%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0313%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.066%7 Aug
dust213–50.0112%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0317%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0233%6 Aug
anubis11–130.0226%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0047%28 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0216%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.077%23 Jul
mirage13–40.1029%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0217%23 Jul
nuke13–60.1215%23 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0420%22 Jul
dust29–130.0026%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0423%22 Jul
nuke2–13-0.096%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0222%19 Jul
cache13–40.0129%19 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0824%19 Jul
anubis13–50.0912%19 Jul
anubis9–130.0512%18 Jul
inferno12–160.0020%18 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0428%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0419%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0118%15 Jul
cache3–13-0.064%15 Jul
mirage8–130.0417%14 Jul
nuke10–130.0419%14 Jul
mirage2–80.0117%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0626%13 Jul
ancient11–130.0913%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0524%13 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0711%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0636%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0316%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0126%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0711%12 Jul
cache13–50.0421%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0136%10 Jul
anubis13–50.0323%10 Jul
mirage12–160.0115%9 Jul
cache13–5-0.0124%9 Jul
cache13–40.0214%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →