Albertosaurus

Albertosaurus — CS2 Stats

76561198940624760[U:1:980359032]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

816Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating7,974Light Blue band · top ~64.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40208 of 54127 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAlbertosaurusPREMIER7,974 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning45
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49474Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9
Aggression5.7
Utility6.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.5
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time622ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC23101343%0.00
dust2B1991047%-0.02
infernoB189950%-0.02
cacheA138562%-0.01
nukeC94544%-0.01
ancientS550100%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.02
debris2020%-0.05
vertigo21150%-0.04
poseidon220100%0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.04
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
638msReaction time
17.0%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
17.09HE damage / grenade
9.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4834 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.0009% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0319%29 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1211%28 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0410%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0314%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0411%23 Aug
cache11–13-0.0619%20 Aug
debris8–80.0129%20 Aug
dust213–60.0219%20 Aug
vertigo7–9-0.2317%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0210%19 Aug
dust213–70.0110%19 Aug
mirage4–130.0825%17 Aug
dust211–130.0213%15 Aug
dust213–50.0319%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0211%15 Aug
cache13–1-0.0413%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0719%13 Aug
cache15–15-0.0313%13 Aug
nuke9–5-0.026%13 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0514%12 Aug
poseidon9–7-0.0022%12 Aug
inferno16–140.058%11 Aug
inferno9–1-0.0133%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0113%5 Aug
mirage6–130.008%5 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0315%4 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0222%3 Aug
inferno6–90.028%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0222%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0820%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0215%30 Jul
dust23–13-0.0717%29 Jul
mirage6–130.0022%29 Jul
cache1–13-0.0432%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0518%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0017%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0416%28 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0114%28 Jul
nuke6–9-0.1315%27 Jul
inferno16–130.017%26 Jul
mirage7–00.0928%26 Jul
nuke1–13-0.1012%26 Jul
anubis13–90.0522%26 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1319%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0415%25 Jul
cache13–90.0412%25 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0733%25 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0123%24 Jul
dust215–15-0.0120%24 Jul
debris5–9-0.1025%24 Jul
inferno5–90.0216%24 Jul
vertigo9–50.1514%22 Jul
cache16–13-0.0214%22 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0114%22 Jul
ancient13–80.0715%21 Jul
poseidon9–70.0433%21 Jul
dust27–13-0.0212%19 Jul
anubis9–13-0.056%19 Jul
dust29–2-0.110%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0022%18 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0519%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0514%18 Jul
cache13–7-0.0223%18 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0914%17 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2617%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0615%15 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0224%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0314%14 Jul
dust216–12-0.0614%14 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0019%14 Jul
mirage11–10.0421%14 Jul
cache13–10.1115%14 Jul
dust25–00.020%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0519%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0121%13 Jul
inferno9–30.2116%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.039%11 Jul
cache16–12-0.066%11 Jul
mirage16–130.0215%10 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0415%9 Jul
anubis5–13-0.077%9 Jul
train12–12-0.0312%7 Jul
dust213–70.0118%6 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0019%6 Jul
nuke13–20.1125%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0122%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0310%5 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0713%4 Jul
dust213–11-0.0511%4 Jul
ancient13–90.016%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.029%4 Jul
dust27–13-0.035%4 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0114%4 Jul
nuke13–70.0210%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.035%3 Jul
inferno11–13-0.029%3 Jul
mirage13–160.0316%1 Jul
nuke13–100.0919%1 Jul
dust211–13-0.068%30 Jun
dust213–70.119%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →