Sothung

Sothung — CS2 Stats

LB76561198887110797[U:1:926845069]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,258Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSothungFACEITLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning57
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateLWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.3
Utility4.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.7
Utility4.0
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time650ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — office 12–12
132Biggest win — office
5Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 19officeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD32112134%0.00
dust2A1911858%0.02
ancientC104640%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.02
anubisD62433%0.01
infernoC52340%-0.01
officeD51420%0.01
overpassC52340%-0.00
cache21150%-0.01
poseidon21150%0.02
warden110100%-0.01
alpine1010%0.01
stronghold110100%0.02
sanctum110100%0.07
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,246Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
82.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24545%1.0416.1
Dust217348%1.0816.5
Ancient13055%1.1717.4
Anubis7859%1.0816.3
Inferno6751%1.0214.4
Nuke5947%1.0516.0
Overpass2741%0.8915.4
Train1553%1.0915.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
91.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
648msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
6.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4077 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.4804% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0243%26 Aug
dust213–30.1131%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0120%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0315%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0426%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0236%23 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0227%21 Aug
dust213–90.0520%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0527%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0122%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0635%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0216%2 Aug
dust213–4-0.0227%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0333%13 Jul
dust213–80.0218%1 May
mirage6–130.0025%1 May
ancient6–130.0225%29 Apr
cache11–130.0124%29 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0011%29 Apr
mirage13–60.1130%28 Apr
mirage9–13-0.003%20 Apr
mirage2–130.0027%18 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0614%17 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0417%15 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0036%31 Mar
dust27–130.0339%30 Mar
dust213–16-0.0420%30 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0415%21 Mar
mirage9–130.0222%21 Mar
mirage11–130.0117%21 Mar
anubis8–130.0116%21 Mar
office4–13-0.0717%20 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0522%20 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0221%20 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0219%18 Mar
mirage9–130.0518%18 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0024%18 Mar
nuke13–90.0221%18 Mar
mirage8–130.0326%18 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0419%17 Mar
dust213–50.0745%17 Mar
mirage13–80.0218%16 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0216%16 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0014%15 Mar
dust211–130.0425%15 Mar
dust213–80.0915%14 Mar
mirage13–30.0110%14 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0320%13 Mar
dust213–100.0119%13 Mar
office8–13-0.000%7 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0422%7 Mar
mirage13–100.0419%7 Mar
office8–13-0.0531%6 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0314%6 Mar
dust28–13-0.0430%6 Mar
anubis13–60.0823%5 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0128%1 Mar
dust213–60.0533%1 Mar
ancient11–130.0315%1 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0217%1 Mar
office13–20.0422%28 Feb
poseidon3–9-0.0450%28 Feb
office12–120.1411%28 Feb
inferno13–30.0442%28 Feb
mirage13–30.1033%27 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0110%25 Feb
overpass13–20.0930%22 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0316%21 Feb
anubis8–130.0018%20 Feb
mirage16–130.0123%20 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0620%19 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0520%13 Feb
dust213–70.0733%13 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0219%13 Feb
warden13–6-0.019%12 Feb
alpine12–120.0118%12 Feb
stronghold6–10.0214%12 Feb
dust214–16-0.0311%12 Feb
dust213–80.0420%12 Feb
nuke9–30.049%9 Feb
mirage11–130.0228%8 Feb
mirage1–13-0.0415%8 Feb
nuke8–8-0.1022%3 Feb
sanctum9–50.0737%2 Feb
poseidon9–40.0920%2 Feb
dust23–13-0.0817%28 Jan
mirage10–130.0020%22 Jan
inferno13–40.0411%17 Jan
dust27–130.0217%15 Jan
mirage16–14-0.0419%13 Jan
inferno8–13-0.057%11 Jan
ancient13–3-0.0030%11 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0512%10 Jan
vertigo12–120.0213%6 Jan
ancient13–60.0825%5 Jan
mirage8–130.0015%28 Dec
overpass9–13-0.048%22 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0819%8 Dec
mirage1–130.0021%5 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0128%5 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →