Sothung — CS2 Stats
LB76561198887110797[U:1:926845069]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 32 | 11–21 | 34% | 0.00 | |
| A | 19 | 11–8 | 58% | 0.02 | |
| C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | -0.01 | |
| A | 9 | 5–4 | 56% | -0.02 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.01 | |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.01 | |
| office | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | 0.01 |
| C | 5 | 2–3 | 40% | -0.00 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.01 | |
| poseidon | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.02 |
| warden | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.01 |
| alpine | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.01 |
| stronghold | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
| sanctum | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.07 |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 245 | 45% | 1.04 | 16.1 |
| Dust2 | 173 | 48% | 1.08 | 16.5 |
| Ancient | 130 | 55% | 1.17 | 17.4 |
| Anubis | 78 | 59% | 1.08 | 16.3 |
| Inferno | 67 | 51% | 1.02 | 14.4 |
| Nuke | 59 | 47% | 1.05 | 16.0 |
| Overpass | 27 | 41% | 0.89 | 15.4 |
| Train | 15 | 53% | 1.09 | 15.9 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4077 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.4804% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 43% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.11 | 31% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.04 | 26% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 36% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.02 | 27% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 20% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 22% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 35% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.02 | 27% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 33% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 18% | 1 May → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 25% | 1 May → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 11% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.11 | 30% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 3% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.00 | 27% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.04 | 17% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 36% | 31 Mar → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 39% | 30 Mar → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.04 | 20% | 30 Mar → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.04 | 15% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 17% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 21 Mar → | ||
| office | 4–13 | -0.07 | 17% | 20 Mar → | |
| 13–11 | -0.05 | 22% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 18% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.00 | 24% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 21% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 45% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 18% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 14% | 15 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 25% | 15 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 15% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.01 | 10% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.03 | 20% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 19% | 13 Mar → | ||
| office | 8–13 | -0.00 | 0% | 7 Mar → | |
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 7 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 19% | 7 Mar → | ||
| office | 8–13 | -0.05 | 31% | 6 Mar → | |
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 14% | 6 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 6 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 23% | 5 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 33% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 15% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 17% | 1 Mar → | ||
| office | 13–2 | 0.04 | 22% | 28 Feb → | |
| poseidon | 3–9 | -0.04 | 50% | 28 Feb → | |
| office | 12–12 | 0.14 | 11% | 28 Feb → | |
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 42% | 28 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 33% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 10% | 25 Feb → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.09 | 30% | 22 Feb → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.03 | 16% | 21 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 18% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.01 | 23% | 20 Feb → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 19 Feb → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 20% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 33% | 13 Feb → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 13 Feb → | ||
| warden | 13–6 | -0.01 | 9% | 12 Feb → | |
| alpine | 12–12 | 0.01 | 18% | 12 Feb → | |
| stronghold | 6–1 | 0.02 | 14% | 12 Feb → | |
| 14–16 | -0.03 | 11% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 20% | 12 Feb → | ||
| 9–3 | 0.04 | 9% | 9 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 28% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 8 Feb → | ||
| 8–8 | -0.10 | 22% | 3 Feb → | ||
| sanctum | 9–5 | 0.07 | 37% | 2 Feb → | |
| poseidon | 9–4 | 0.09 | 20% | 2 Feb → | |
| 3–13 | -0.08 | 17% | 28 Jan → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 20% | 22 Jan → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 11% | 17 Jan → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 17% | 15 Jan → | ||
| 16–14 | -0.04 | 19% | 13 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 7% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.00 | 30% | 11 Jan → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 12% | 10 Jan → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 13% | 6 Jan → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 25% | 5 Jan → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.00 | 15% | 28 Dec → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 22 Dec → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.08 | 19% | 8 Dec → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.00 | 21% | 5 Nov → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 28% | 5 Nov → |
Match data via Leetify.