Æthelstan — CS2 Stats

76561198884350390[U:1:924084662]✓ No bans

2,295Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating28,389Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#367 of 23729 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGÆthelstanFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER28,389 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning31
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6436Last 10064%Win rateWLWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression2.2
Utility4.1
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning3.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time548ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
165In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27171063%-0.02
mirageS2317674%-0.01
infernoS1510567%0.01
anubisS128467%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.01
ancientS54180%0.00
overpass110100%0.00
alpine1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

501Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
79.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21656%0.9116.2
Inferno1060%1.0014.3
Mirage580%1.2620.8
Nuke520%0.6511.0
Anubis3100%1.0618.3
Cache367%1.0413.7
Overpass1100%1.1721.0
Ancient10%1.0018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
558msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
24.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
12.60HE damage / grenade
2.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4542 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7485% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0318%19 Aug
dust24–130.0517%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0114%19 Aug
dust216–12-0.0218%19 Aug
dust21–13-0.1140%19 Aug
mirage0–3-0.070%19 Aug
cache0–13-0.1210%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0324%18 Aug
inferno13–110.0412%18 Aug
mirage11–60.028%17 Aug
inferno13–20.2524%17 Aug
dust213–50.0522%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0223%17 Aug
dust213–50.0516%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0513%17 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0616%17 Aug
mirage13–3-0.039%17 Aug
cache13–11-0.039%17 Aug
dust26–0-0.020%17 Aug
inferno7–130.0213%16 Aug
cache13–50.0219%16 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0113%15 Aug
dust213–30.0329%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0135%15 Aug
dust211–5-0.0425%15 Aug
ancient2–13-0.080%15 Aug
dust20–13-0.020%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0616%7 Aug
mirage13–90.0625%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0019%6 Aug
cache13–7-0.0128%6 Aug
cache6–130.0422%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0019%4 Jul
nuke9–130.0221%4 Jul
dust213–9-0.0516%29 Jun
inferno13–30.009%28 Jun
dust213–7-0.0312%28 Jun
anubis7–13-0.1014%28 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0122%28 Jun
anubis14–160.0813%28 Jun
inferno13–80.0715%23 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0117%21 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0025%21 Jun
nuke2–13-0.109%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.0611%19 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0916%19 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0221%19 Jun
mirage13–110.0117%17 Jun
dust213–110.0123%12 Jun
cache11–130.0219%12 Jun
anubis13–70.019%9 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0415%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.1016%9 Jun
ancient13–90.0217%9 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0318%9 Jun
dust213–9-0.0512%8 Jun
mirage13–80.0717%8 Jun
nuke13–4-0.007%8 Jun
mirage5–13-0.053%8 Jun
dust210–130.0117%7 Jun
anubis7–13-0.098%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0719%7 Jun
dust216–140.0016%7 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0114%7 Jun
anubis16–140.0517%7 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0116%7 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0115%7 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0715%7 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0416%6 Jun
nuke13–50.0718%6 Jun
anubis13–100.0315%5 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0610%5 Jun
dust25–13-0.0416%5 Jun
anubis13–110.0013%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0614%5 Jun
mirage10–13-0.029%4 Jun
anubis10–130.015%4 Jun
dust213–10-0.0320%4 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0518%4 Jun
inferno13–80.0215%3 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0618%3 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0310%3 Jun
dust213–100.018%3 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0615%3 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0316%3 Jun
ancient13–90.1025%3 Jun
overpass13–80.0012%3 Jun
dust214–160.0315%2 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0311%2 Jun
alpine10–130.0217%31 May
anubis13–11-0.0819%31 May
anubis13–11-0.066%31 May
dust27–13-0.0619%31 May
dust211–13-0.0115%31 May
dust216–14-0.016%31 May
mirage13–11-0.0422%31 May
dust213–11-0.0118%31 May
mirage13–4-0.0714%31 May
dust213–11-0.0219%31 May
inferno13–9-0.0215%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →