~ Affinity ~ — CS2 Stats

76561198876366851[U:1:916101123]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

453Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,519Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning56

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateWWLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression9.4

Utility5.0

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.6

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time587ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%+3.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–2Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 48% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	34	19–15	56%	0.03
dust2	B	21	10–11	48%	0.01
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
nuke	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.04
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches

54%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

80.4ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

36%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	39	59%	1.04	15.9
Dust2	21	52%	0.92	15.8
Inferno	8	62%	1.22	20.3
Ancient	5	80%	1.06	15.2
Overpass	4	25%	0.97	18.5
Nuke	3	33%	1.00	16.0
Cache	1	0%	1.11	20.0
Train	1	0%	0.97	30.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.2%Spray accuracy

82.5%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

574msReaction time

43.1%T opening success

50.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

7.4%Flash assists

10.92HE damage / grenade

2.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.8824 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–7	0.00	6%	19 May →
inferno	19–15	0.04	20%	18 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	8%	18 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	10%	12 May →
mirage	13–8	0.04	25%	5 May →
cache	13–11	-0.03	19%	5 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	25%	28 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	26%	15 Apr →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	11%	14 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.06	34%	7 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.04	27%	7 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.14	25%	30 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.02	35%	18 Mar →
nuke	11–13	0.04	28%	17 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	14%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.02	17%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.09	29%	2 Mar →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	5%	2 Mar →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	15%	2 Mar →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	17%	1 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.02	13%	1 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.04	10%	28 Feb →
inferno	13–6	0.02	15%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	15%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.06	29%	27 Feb →
ancient	13–9	0.05	19%	27 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	16%	27 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	29%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–10	0.02	19%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.00	18%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–8	0.13	22%	26 Feb →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	10%	26 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.10	19%	26 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	24%	26 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.03	26%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.00	14%	26 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	24%	25 Feb →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	33%	25 Feb →
dust2	5–13	0.05	12%	25 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.02	21%	23 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.03	21%	23 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.01	22%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.03	18%	22 Feb →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	9%	22 Feb →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	30%	22 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.03	17%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	42%	21 Feb →
ancient	11–13	0.01	14%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	12%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–10	0.10	15%	21 Feb →
overpass	13–7	0.08	32%	21 Feb →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	16%	19 Feb →
vertigo	13–3	-0.07	100%	19 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.05	17%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.15	24%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.06	24%	18 Feb →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	33%	18 Feb →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	18%	18 Feb →
dust2	16–13	-0.05	24%	18 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	11%	18 Feb →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	14%	18 Feb →
ancient	13–16	-0.03	14%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.06	27%	18 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	22%	18 Feb →
ancient	13–8	0.07	11%	18 Feb →
dust2	14–16	-0.08	18%	17 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.07	11%	17 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.09	25%	17 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	20%	17 Feb →
dust2	13–2	0.00	14%	17 Feb →
overpass	13–9	-0.07	14%	17 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	25%	17 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.00	17%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.05	27%	16 Feb →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	19%	12 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	17%	11 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.01	13%	10 Feb →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	7%	10 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.06	11%	10 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.03	20%	10 Feb →
ancient	5–13	0.01	10%	9 Feb →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	6%	9 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.03	15%	9 Feb →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	12%	9 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.05	12%	9 Feb →
inferno	6–1	0.01	20%	9 Feb →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	14%	9 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	10%	9 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	23%	6 Feb →
nuke	16–13	-0.00	13%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–2	0.04	19%	6 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.06	11%	6 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	13%	6 Feb →
overpass	8–13	-0.02	10%	6 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	16%	6 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.06	19%	6 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.08	13%	5 Feb →
mirage	16–12	0.06	18%	5 Feb →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	15%	5 Feb →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	17%	5 Feb →