aaaaaaaa

aaaaaaaa — CS2 Stats

76561198872994055[U:1:912728327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

340Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,859Purple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9221 of 18440 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaaaaaaaaFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,859 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning61
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateLLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.6
Utility3.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.1
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–8
130Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS3021970%0.01
dust2B23111248%0.02
ancientB147750%0.02
nukeC125742%-0.02
cacheS86275%0.03
anubisS64267%0.02
infernoD61517%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

198Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
81.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5850%1.0815.7
Dust24955%1.1317.2
Ancient2450%1.1816.3
Anubis1872%1.2520.0
Cache1850%1.0816.0
Nuke1735%1.0616.1
Inferno1338%1.0114.5
Overpass10%2.0633.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
581msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
4.93HE damage / grenade
5.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4534 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1699% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0516%19 Aug
cache11–130.0235%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0121%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0016%14 Aug
dust27–130.0022%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0021%9 Aug
dust216–120.0129%8 Aug
dust213–100.0620%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0521%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0324%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0415%7 Aug
nuke13–110.0233%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0218%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0325%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0430%5 Aug
inferno5–4-0.140%5 Aug
dust211–130.0440%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0017%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0417%4 Aug
dust213–16-0.0221%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0714%2 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0121%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0321%1 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0224%1 Aug
cache5–130.046%31 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0523%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0615%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0424%29 Jul
ancient13–110.1015%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0123%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0115%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0231%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0424%28 Jul
dust213–110.1128%27 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0617%26 Jul
dust213–50.1016%26 Jul
dust216–13-0.0223%25 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0415%25 Jul
anubis16–130.0317%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0718%25 Jul
mirage6–130.0117%24 Jul
dust213–50.0420%24 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0410%23 Jul
dust213–80.1330%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0519%22 Jul
cache13–10.0023%22 Jul
mirage13–80.1116%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0312%22 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0211%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0717%20 Jul
cache13–9-0.0417%20 Jul
anubis13–160.0218%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0324%19 Jul
mirage13–50.0927%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0315%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.0226%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0424%18 Jul
cache16–140.0124%18 Jul
ancient2–13-0.105%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0417%16 Jul
nuke13–40.0513%16 Jul
ancient13–00.1222%16 Jul
ancient13–90.0932%16 Jul
mirage13–9-0.044%16 Jul
dust25–130.0326%16 Jul
dust213–1-0.0129%15 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0322%15 Jul
mirage13–20.0319%15 Jul
dust24–13-0.0330%15 Jul
inferno13–160.0322%15 Jul
ancient11–130.0526%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0633%14 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0225%14 Jul
mirage13–30.0818%13 Jul
mirage11–130.0126%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0640%13 Jul
anubis13–30.0219%13 Jul
mirage15–150.0324%13 Jul
mirage3–13-0.026%13 Jul
cache16–140.0415%13 Jul
dust25–130.0924%13 Jul
cache13–100.1318%13 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0612%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0241%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0421%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0216%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0725%12 Jul
dust213–100.0131%11 Jul
dust213–16-0.0319%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0110%10 Jul
dust215–15-0.0016%9 Jul
cache13–90.0122%9 Jul
dust216–12-0.0011%5 Jul
nuke4–130.0438%5 Jul
ancient5–130.0116%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0620%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0512%4 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0413%4 Jul
overpass11–13-0.0419%4 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0719%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →