markz1n — CS2 Stats

76561198871771952[U:1:911506224]

254Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,567Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2028 of 16046 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarkz1nFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER25,567 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning49
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.2
Utility3.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch0.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.9
Utility3.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time643ms+54ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy29.6%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.32Best rating — nuke 9–4
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB38182047%0.02
dust2D2061430%0.01
infernoB147750%0.03
ancientA117464%0.03
nukeS75271%0.07
cacheA53260%0.02
anubis440100%0.02
debris1010%-0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
56%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
84.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1080%1.2722.4
Dust21050%1.0315.5
Mirage1030%1.1316.0
Inferno560%1.3721.2
Ancient540%0.9116.6
Nuke1100%1.4320.0
Cache1100%0.9212.0
Train1100%1.4413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
638msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
5.68HE damage / grenade
4.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4347% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0220%27 Aug
dust214–16-0.0424%25 Aug
nuke9–40.3253%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0219%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0523%18 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0520%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0225%17 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0221%16 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0529%16 Aug
cache13–80.0220%16 Aug
mirage12–120.0221%15 Aug
ancient13–80.1133%15 Aug
mirage9–130.0536%15 Aug
anubis19–170.0324%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0126%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0218%11 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0815%10 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0827%10 Aug
dust20–30.00100%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0224%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0321%10 Aug
inferno0–130.0027%10 Aug
dust27–3-0.0329%10 Aug
dust213–50.0433%10 Aug
mirage9–00.1660%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0231%9 Aug
mirage3–50.1055%9 Aug
mirage8–130.0333%8 Aug
mirage13–20.1527%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0118%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0217%6 Aug
dust210–130.0631%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0119%5 Aug
mirage13–40.1429%5 Aug
anubis13–100.0128%4 Aug
dust213–80.1223%3 Aug
ancient4–4-0.0231%3 Aug
mirage13–160.0623%2 Aug
dust211–130.0221%2 Aug
ancient13–50.0929%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0111%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0624%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0042%1 Aug
dust25–130.0421%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0022%31 Jul
mirage16–130.0632%31 Jul
mirage13–10.0639%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0836%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0933%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0222%30 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0738%24 Jul
mirage13–4-0.1333%22 Jul
inferno0–6-0.0260%21 Jul
mirage12–0-0.020%21 Jul
dust20–13-0.0875%21 Jul
dust20–13-0.090%20 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0326%20 Jul
dust212–160.0421%20 Jul
mirage16–130.0918%20 Jul
mirage0–13-0.1167%20 Jul
dust213–00.0736%20 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0460%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0516%20 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0128%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0927%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0829%19 Jul
dust211–13-0.0016%19 Jul
dust213–110.1423%19 Jul
inferno16–140.1623%19 Jul
cache16–140.0424%19 Jul
mirage13–40.1329%19 Jul
ancient13–20.1224%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0520%18 Jul
dust20–13-0.03100%18 Jul
cache13–60.0728%15 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0413%15 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0315%14 Jul
dust213–3-0.0123%14 Jul
dust215–15-0.0121%14 Jul
debris2–9-0.2120%14 Jul
inferno9–30.1230%14 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0327%13 Jul
nuke15–150.0229%13 Jul
inferno13–30.0818%13 Jul
nuke13–60.0415%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0322%12 Jul
nuke13–10.0819%12 Jul
inferno13–80.0224%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0555%11 Jul
mirage13–7-0.028%11 Jul
inferno10–130.0625%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0534%11 Jul
mirage16–140.0425%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0219%7 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0429%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0517%6 Jul
inferno13–90.0428%5 Jul
inferno11–130.0425%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0329%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0117%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →