Tafty — CS2 Stats

76561198870543428[U:1:910277700]

1,923Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,806Purple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24285 of 54335 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,388 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTaftyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,388 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,806 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning67
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38575Last 10038%Win rateWWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3
Aggression9.8
Utility3.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–7
133Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13mirageWeakest map · 33% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD30102033%0.01
dust2C1771041%0.01
cacheB137654%0.02
nukeB115645%0.01
ancientC73443%-0.01
anubisD62433%-0.01
infernoB63350%-0.02
poseidon4040%-0.08
vertigo2020%-0.05
office2020%-0.00
eldorado21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
58%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4257%0.9915.6
Dust21861%1.1417.2
Ancient1553%0.9816.4
Inferno1369%0.9814.7
Nuke1040%0.8413.4
Train475%0.9416.5
Overpass333%0.7413.7
Anubis1100%0.5010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
595msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
61.2%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
13.6%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
5.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.427 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6768% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0419%30 Aug
cache13–110.0421%30 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0214%30 Aug
mirage6–130.0124%30 Aug
cache10–13-0.0123%30 Aug
anubis1–9-0.0018%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0220%30 Aug
inferno13–40.0241%30 Aug
dust25–2-0.0233%26 Aug
nuke14–160.0418%26 Aug
cache13–60.0433%26 Aug
mirage13–70.0831%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0014%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.088%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0024%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0026%25 Aug
mirage4–130.0141%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0318%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0224%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0226%24 Aug
dust28–100.0325%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0123%24 Aug
dust25–130.0422%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0127%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.018%23 Aug
dust211–130.0720%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0119%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0412%22 Aug
cache8–130.0317%22 Aug
nuke13–90.0531%21 Aug
anubis2–70.0720%21 Aug
ancient8–130.0214%21 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0917%21 Aug
mirage13–70.1114%21 Aug
dust213–100.0328%15 Aug
nuke9–130.0518%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0126%15 Aug
cache13–70.1525%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0113%15 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0321%12 Aug
dust213–40.0625%12 Aug
mirage16–120.0433%12 Aug
cache13–110.0427%12 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0026%12 Aug
dust210–130.0122%12 Aug
dust213–60.0817%11 Aug
nuke9–130.1035%11 Aug
mirage13–50.1113%11 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0026%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0224%10 Aug
cache13–30.0128%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0325%10 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0430%10 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0212%10 Aug
mirage13–60.0711%8 Aug
cache1–8-0.0922%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0524%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0133%7 Aug
poseidon1–9-0.1318%30 Jul
ancient11–130.0417%30 Jul
anubis13–60.0012%29 Jul
mirage10–130.0530%29 Jul
cache8–130.0427%29 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0529%29 Jul
dust213–70.0113%29 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0526%29 Jul
mirage12–160.0120%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0926%26 Jul
office0–4-0.040%25 Jul
cache13–90.0718%25 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0016%25 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0731%25 Jul
cache13–160.0130%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0219%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0315%25 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0314%25 Jul
nuke13–60.0314%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0124%25 Jul
dust21–50.0543%24 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0231%24 Jul
poseidon5–9-0.1524%23 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0732%23 Jul
nuke9–70.019%23 Jul
mirage6–130.0021%15 Jul
dust213–100.0427%15 Jul
dust213–7-0.0128%15 Jul
office1–70.0360%15 Jul
dust20–13-0.0554%15 Jul
inferno16–120.0126%15 Jul
cache2–13-0.0532%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0126%15 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0827%14 Jul
eldorado9–60.0722%14 Jul
eldorado8–8-0.0529%14 Jul
poseidon8–8-0.0119%14 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.0512%14 Jul
nuke10–13-0.027%14 Jul
mirage10–130.0413%14 Jul
dust213–80.0326%14 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0217%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →