ϟElectronicCigaretteAssociationϟ — CS2 Stats

76561198870097337[U:1:909831609]

4,497Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,893Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15933 of 39142 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGϟElectronicCigaretteAssoc…FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,893 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning32
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44497Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.5
Aggression1.2
Utility7.3
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning3.2
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time544ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–2
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011955%0.03
ancientC2081240%-0.00
cacheC135838%0.01
infernoC125742%0.01
dust2C125742%0.00
nukeA106460%0.03
anubisD82625%0.01
office31233%-0.00
train21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

620Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
79.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4755%1.0814.6
Ancient2454%1.1616.8
Anubis1937%1.1816.3
Inferno1839%1.3115.7
Dust21850%0.9615.2
Nuke1354%1.0114.1
Vertigo875%1.0815.8
Train333%1.3017.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
545msReaction time
21.9%T opening success
24.6%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
11.11HE damage / grenade
15.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.0018%30 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0215%30 Aug
ancient13–40.0318%30 Aug
nuke7–130.0715%30 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0021%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0721%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0513%28 Aug
inferno15–150.0912%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0333%28 Aug
cache7–130.0028%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0420%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0317%27 Aug
mirage7–130.0016%27 Aug
ancient8–130.0524%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0412%27 Aug
inferno13–60.0516%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0919%26 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0014%26 Aug
dust213–100.0328%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.076%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0319%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0810%26 Aug
dust213–5-0.069%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.035%26 Aug
dust216–12-0.0120%26 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0738%26 Aug
cache13–90.0724%26 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0121%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0723%26 Aug
dust212–120.0017%26 Aug
cache13–110.0320%26 Aug
mirage7–130.0131%26 Aug
office13–60.0221%26 Aug
dust211–130.0028%25 Aug
inferno9–20.2125%25 Aug
dust27–130.0119%25 Aug
ancient13–110.0119%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0121%25 Aug
cache13–100.0412%25 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0512%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0024%24 Aug
mirage6–20.0136%24 Aug
ancient0–13-0.068%24 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0725%24 Aug
ancient15–150.0319%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0011%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0019%24 Aug
anubis9–130.018%24 Aug
dust213–20.1620%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0019%24 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0020%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0311%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0420%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0618%23 Aug
dust24–13-0.036%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0918%23 Aug
inferno9–130.0514%22 Aug
anubis13–100.0221%22 Aug
cache8–130.0210%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0421%22 Aug
mirage13–80.1419%22 Aug
anubis13–70.0221%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0623%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0126%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0420%21 Aug
inferno8–130.0330%21 Aug
dust29–130.0726%21 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0020%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0317%21 Aug
cache13–30.0231%21 Aug
mirage11–10.0814%21 Aug
nuke13–70.1012%21 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0315%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0319%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0325%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0513%21 Aug
cache13–90.0227%20 Aug
ancient15–150.0318%20 Aug
office11–130.0231%19 Aug
office6–13-0.0527%19 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0419%19 Aug
nuke11–130.0722%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0532%19 Aug
mirage13–30.1528%19 Aug
train13–9-0.0135%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1225%19 Aug
cache4–13-0.0531%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0528%17 Aug
nuke13–80.0217%17 Aug
ancient7–13-0.1118%16 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0418%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0221%16 Aug
train1–13-0.0064%16 Aug
cache11–130.0021%16 Aug
anubis1–70.0933%16 Aug
nuke13–50.0827%16 Aug
cache6–130.0212%16 Aug
cache9–130.0721%16 Aug
ancient15–150.0220%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →