Inspector Seb

Inspector Seb — CS2 Stats

DE76561198869701252[U:1:909435524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,178Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,173Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2209 of 8107 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,007 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGInspector SebFACEITLevel 8 · 2,007 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,173 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning58
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50464Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4
Aggression9.9
Utility3.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning5.8
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time581ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy31.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 30.3% → last ⅓ avg 31.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–5
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB27131448%0.02
mirageS2013765%0.01
dust2D1651131%0.00
ancientB137654%0.03
anubisC104640%0.03
nukeA74357%-0.01
infernoS64267%0.07
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

295Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
87.8ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7057%1.0716.9
Dust24953%1.1317.8
Ancient3647%1.1718.8
Anubis2662%1.1519.1
Inferno2568%1.1516.5
Nuke1638%0.8513.7
Cache1346%1.1818.4
Overpass333%1.2620.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.9%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
607msReaction time
42.9%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
4.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.393 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–8-0.0131%28 Aug
cache11–130.0133%23 Aug
inferno1–60.000%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0731%22 Aug
nuke13–5-0.078%22 Aug
dust26–130.0344%22 Aug
anubis6–30.1044%22 Aug
cache13–70.0435%22 Aug
cache13–90.0224%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0949%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0637%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0351%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0144%21 Aug
cache16–140.1135%21 Aug
anubis10–130.1022%21 Aug
inferno6–10.1333%21 Aug
mirage13–10.0332%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.0158%21 Aug
mirage6–130.0024%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0536%20 Aug
dust213–160.0224%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0646%19 Aug
inferno10–130.0835%19 Aug
dust21–13-0.0916%17 Aug
cache13–50.0429%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0036%17 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0416%17 Aug
cache13–50.0433%17 Aug
cache15–150.0731%17 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0010%17 Aug
ancient13–50.1525%17 Aug
dust216–120.0434%16 Aug
dust25–11-0.0431%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0033%14 Aug
anubis6–130.0333%14 Aug
dust213–100.0333%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0424%12 Aug
dust213–110.0028%12 Aug
ancient8–130.0637%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0539%12 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0123%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0821%12 Aug
mirage13–100.0039%12 Aug
cache13–10.1022%11 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0315%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.0825%8 Aug
dust210–130.0124%8 Aug
ancient6–130.0424%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.0221%7 Aug
cache14–160.0727%7 Aug
nuke13–30.0526%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0226%5 Aug
cache13–3-0.0233%5 Aug
ancient11–130.0323%5 Aug
cache11–13-0.0217%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0225%5 Aug
inferno13–50.0227%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0324%29 Jul
mirage5–100.0839%27 Jul
dust29–130.0140%27 Jul
inferno10–30.1235%27 Jul
dust213–30.1130%27 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0118%27 Jul
nuke14–160.0136%24 Jul
cache13–70.0124%23 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0122%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.1231%22 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0522%22 Jul
cache2–80.0340%21 Jul
mirage9–20.0641%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0423%20 Jul
dust213–10.0019%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0224%18 Jul
ancient13–40.0230%18 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0622%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0613%18 Jul
cache4–90.0219%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0130%16 Jul
cache8–130.0428%16 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0530%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0026%16 Jul
inferno13–90.0833%16 Jul
cache10–130.0831%16 Jul
cache13–80.0727%16 Jul
cache8–130.0227%16 Jul
anubis13–160.0124%16 Jul
dust215–15-0.0025%12 Jul
cache0–10-0.0639%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0148%12 Jul
cache13–110.0121%12 Jul
anubis10–50.0435%12 Jul
cache15–150.0424%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.0227%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0038%11 Jul
anubis13–10.1046%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0738%11 Jul
cache8–13-0.0256%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0937%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →