Old Clem — CS2 Stats

76561198869000754[U:1:908735026]

385Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating15,107Purple band · top ~28% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19639 of 31842 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

15,107Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 15,107
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,893 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning50

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2

Aggression3.5

Utility5.3

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning5.0

Utility5.3

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time612ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms

Headshot accuracy16.3%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — overpass 9–0

13–0Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	18	12–6	67%	0.02
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.00
mirage	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.02
inferno	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
dust2	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.03
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
office	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.05
vertigo	—	3	3–0	100%	0.10
debris	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.06
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy

32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

74.8%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

623msReaction time

21.4%T opening success

44.5%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

11.25HE damage / grenade

3.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.1645 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.4167% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	1–13	-0.06	8%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	9%	26 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.06	15%	25 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	13%	25 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	22%	24 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	13%	24 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	8%	24 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	16%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	23%	22 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.04	32%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.10	13%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.10	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	12%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–6	-0.07	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	21%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	32%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	14%	15 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	9%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.01	23%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	23%	11 Aug →
vertigo	9–5	0.06	18%	10 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.05	10%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	11%	10 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	19%	10 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.11	20%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	13%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.12	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	17%	7 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	20%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	12%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.09	22%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	16%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.00	38%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	10%	3 Aug →
office	2–13	-0.06	26%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	13%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	19%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	16%	2 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.04	14%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	15%	1 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.02	12%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	28%	1 Aug →
overpass	9–0	0.21	19%	31 Jul →
debris	9–7	-0.13	24%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.08	18%	31 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.10	8%	31 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	16%	31 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.01	18%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	15%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	27%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	14%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	21%	28 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	8%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.01	15%	28 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	19%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	22%	27 Jul →
vertigo	9–2	0.17	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	9%	27 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.03	21%	26 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	9%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	23%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.03	21%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	17%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.05	24%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.07	4%	21 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.01	13%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	24%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.13	26%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	20%	20 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	17%	18 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.05	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	27%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.08	26%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	13%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.01	10%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.08	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	7%	13 Jul →