Butterzz12

Butterzz12 — CS2 Stats

76561198864483342[U:1:904217614]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,854Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,182Purple band · top ~15.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14050 of 27625 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGButterzz12PREMIER18,182 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning50
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54442Last 10054%Win rateWWLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.9
Utility5.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time565ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11cacheWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB178947%-0.01
mirageB179853%0.02
cacheD1541127%-0.00
nukeS118373%0.01
anubisS118373%0.01
infernoS75271%-0.02
poseidonB63350%0.02
dust2A53260%-0.01
overpass43175%0.03
vertigo42250%0.01
office110100%-0.04
train1010%-0.12
sanctum1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

265Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9357%1.0214.6
Ancient5151%1.1017.6
Nuke3348%1.0115.2
Anubis2662%1.0115.7
Inferno2330%0.8813.9
Overpass1155%0.9715.4
Dust2944%1.0517.0
Train580%1.0322.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
563msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.66HE damage / grenade
10.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4416 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0488% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.007%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0020%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0810%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0320%24 Aug
nuke13–80.0524%24 Aug
mirage16–130.0225%22 Aug
cache13–10.0816%17 Aug
anubis13–110.0110%17 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0320%17 Aug
nuke13–40.1218%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0124%12 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0323%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0418%12 Aug
cache5–13-0.0319%10 Aug
inferno16–130.0219%10 Aug
mirage16–140.0713%9 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0216%4 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0312%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0014%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0426%31 Jul
cache13–70.0721%31 Jul
ancient13–100.0122%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0218%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0623%30 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0513%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0122%28 Jul
nuke13–70.0330%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.018%24 Jul
dust213–40.0715%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0516%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0022%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0210%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.0413%16 Jul
cache13–16-0.046%15 Jul
mirage10–130.0112%15 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0218%9 Jul
cache13–60.0819%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.038%8 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0115%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0621%3 Jul
overpass13–110.0213%3 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0724%3 Jul
cache7–13-0.0832%3 Jul
mirage10–130.0214%2 Jul
anubis13–100.0413%1 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0011%30 Jun
nuke13–50.0522%30 Jun
cache4–6-0.0124%28 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0727%28 Jun
poseidon6–9-0.0119%28 Jun
vertigo9–7-0.0516%28 Jun
overpass1–70.0514%27 Jun
ancient7–130.0315%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0120%27 Jun
poseidon9–40.0721%27 Jun
office13–11-0.0421%25 Jun
nuke13–9-0.1020%25 Jun
vertigo11–130.0318%23 Jun
train7–13-0.1211%23 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0215%22 Jun
dust24–130.0029%22 Jun
dust213–10-0.0415%22 Jun
anubis7–130.0514%20 Jun
poseidon9–60.0424%20 Jun
mirage6–130.0024%16 Jun
mirage13–80.0012%16 Jun
overpass13–30.0611%16 Jun
mirage13–10.1816%16 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0424%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0313%14 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0228%14 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0310%14 Jun
ancient13–100.0019%14 Jun
vertigo5–130.0224%13 Jun
vertigo13–30.0517%13 Jun
cache9–130.0630%13 Jun
cache7–130.0312%13 Jun
ancient13–30.0214%13 Jun
ancient12–5-0.0310%13 Jun
sanctum8–8-0.0714%13 Jun
ancient2–7-0.0917%13 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0714%13 Jun
inferno13–100.0433%13 Jun
poseidon9–60.0321%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0116%12 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0314%11 Jun
nuke11–130.0231%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0517%10 Jun
poseidon8–80.0428%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0114%10 Jun
overpass16–140.0011%10 Jun
nuke13–90.0223%9 Jun
dust213–5-0.0116%8 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0515%8 Jun
anubis10–130.0615%8 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0115%5 Jun
anubis13–100.0314%5 Jun
nuke5–10.0719%5 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0115%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.0613%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →