BANDIT

BANDIT — CS2 Stats

US76561198863878552[U:1:903612824]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

320Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 4 · 892 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBANDITFACEITLevel 4 · 892 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning56
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateWLWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3
Aggression6.7
Utility4.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 669ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time645ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−5.8%
first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — ancient 13–4
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%-0.00
dust2C2281436%0.00
nukeC125742%0.00
infernoA116555%-0.02
ancientS96367%0.04
anubisD71614%-0.01
cacheC73443%0.01
vertigo21150%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.01
shelter110100%-0.01
train110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22442%1.1316.9
Mirage2245%1.1115.6
Inferno1267%0.8914.8
Ancient1164%1.1116.7
Overpass743%0.7413.9
Nuke729%1.2216.9
Anubis540%1.0011.2
Cache250%1.2817.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
669msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
6.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4863 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2987% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter13–7-0.0117%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0320%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0116%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0020%19 Aug
ancient13–60.1125%19 Aug
dust25–130.0122%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0219%12 Aug
inferno13–110.0120%12 Aug
dust213–90.0525%9 Aug
mirage5–130.0141%8 Aug
nuke7–130.0013%8 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.017%8 Aug
vertigo0–13-0.0643%7 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0320%7 Aug
mirage13–60.0130%7 Aug
dust212–160.0421%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0210%1 Aug
ancient13–110.0614%31 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0233%12 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0618%8 Jun
anubis6–130.0124%8 Jun
ancient12–120.0217%8 Jun
nuke10–13-0.030%6 Jun
cache1–13-0.0427%2 Jun
dust213–90.0122%1 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0120%1 Jun
mirage5–130.0319%1 Jun
ancient13–40.1318%30 May
dust213–100.0626%28 May
inferno13–50.0223%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0221%25 May
mirage13–70.0525%25 May
nuke12–12-0.0230%21 May
mirage11–13-0.0222%21 May
mirage8–130.0119%21 May
inferno13–7-0.0311%20 May
cache7–130.0016%13 May
cache3–13-0.0218%13 May
cache12–120.1218%9 May
inferno12–16-0.0531%6 May
dust210–13-0.0522%6 May
cache9–2-0.0216%5 May
cache13–7-0.0223%3 May
dust213–4-0.0023%1 May
mirage3–13-0.1013%1 May
cache13–80.0528%29 Apr
dust213–50.0212%26 Apr
mirage3–130.0223%25 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0231%25 Apr
ancient7–130.0215%25 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0217%23 Apr
mirage15–150.0222%21 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0316%20 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0127%20 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0136%20 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0325%20 Apr
nuke6–1-0.0350%19 Apr
nuke13–80.1129%19 Apr
mirage13–30.0731%19 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0227%19 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0123%17 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0215%17 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0221%17 Apr
dust26–13-0.0033%15 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0638%14 Apr
dust211–130.0429%14 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0817%14 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0325%14 Apr
mirage13–70.0724%13 Apr
nuke13–100.0224%10 Apr
dust23–13-0.0326%10 Apr
anubis16–12-0.0032%9 Apr
dust213–30.0924%1 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0238%1 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0120%30 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0229%24 Mar
dust211–130.0220%24 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0310%23 Mar
anubis11–130.0335%23 Mar
dust25–13-0.0613%23 Mar
dust213–100.0123%21 Mar
train13–90.0042%21 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0023%21 Mar
mirage13–20.1139%21 Mar
ancient4–130.0224%20 Mar
dust29–130.0227%19 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0638%18 Mar
dust211–13-0.0145%18 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0141%18 Mar
overpass8–130.0013%18 Mar
nuke10–130.0629%18 Mar
dust214–16-0.0419%18 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0239%18 Mar
dust216–13-0.0616%17 Mar
dust210–13-0.1132%17 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0816%16 Mar
ancient13–20.0124%14 Mar
dust27–130.0225%14 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0334%14 Mar
dust24–130.0527%4 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →