ManJo — CS2 Stats

76561198861206921[U:1:900941193]

1,062Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGManJoFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42535Last 10042%Win rateLLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.4
Aggression4.5
Utility7.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–10
131Biggest win — ancient
3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 54% over 13dust2Weakest map · 23% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%0.02
dust2D2251723%-0.00
infernoD1551033%-0.00
ancientC146843%-0.00
nukeB137654%0.01
anubis42250%0.02
overpass330100%0.03
cache2020%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

150Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
77.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3754%1.1615.7
Dust23148%1.0815.1
Anubis1856%1.2614.4
Ancient1753%1.0015.1
Inferno1547%1.1114.7
Nuke1369%1.4515.7
Cache956%1.3215.1
Overpass1100%1.2515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
558msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
12.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4097% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0418%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0220%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0928%26 Aug
ancient13–11-0.007%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0415%26 Aug
dust216–130.0514%25 Aug
mirage5–130.0328%25 Aug
dust24–13-0.0424%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0620%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0712%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0115%20 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0422%19 Aug
dust213–60.0313%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0415%18 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0411%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0417%13 Aug
inferno13–50.0316%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0013%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0221%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0218%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.039%29 Jul
ancient13–40.0432%29 Jul
mirage13–100.0426%29 Jul
mirage4–130.0526%23 Jul
ancient3–11-0.1020%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0428%19 Jul
mirage13–100.1622%15 Jul
dust211–130.0120%14 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0414%11 Jul
mirage13–100.1310%10 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0130%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0021%10 Jul
dust213–110.1122%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0229%7 Jul
nuke9–130.0030%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0533%21 Jun
inferno7–130.0219%21 Jun
inferno9–130.0627%15 Jun
dust213–100.0219%14 Jun
dust27–130.0320%14 Jun
mirage16–140.0823%14 Jun
dust23–13-0.098%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0030%12 Jun
ancient13–90.0016%12 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0134%10 Jun
anubis13–90.1123%8 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0426%7 Jun
dust211–130.0033%6 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0319%4 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0415%4 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0015%3 Jun
dust29–13-0.0226%3 Jun
dust23–13-0.0421%31 May
overpass16–13-0.0231%27 May
inferno12–16-0.0331%25 May
ancient5–130.0017%25 May
mirage8–13-0.0328%25 May
nuke13–11-0.0324%25 May
dust211–130.0416%25 May
ancient6–13-0.0318%24 May
overpass13–110.0215%24 May
mirage13–70.0227%17 May
dust26–13-0.014%17 May
ancient13–10.0530%17 May
ancient15–150.0426%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0114%30 Apr
cache14–16-0.0317%29 Apr
nuke13–70.1027%27 Apr
inferno13–80.0522%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0018%23 Apr
mirage7–130.0623%23 Apr
nuke13–70.0716%23 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0411%23 Apr
mirage13–40.0625%23 Apr
nuke10–130.0231%23 Apr
anubis13–40.0214%22 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0414%22 Apr
mirage13–110.0418%22 Apr
dust215–150.0314%20 Apr
ancient13–60.0526%20 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0517%20 Apr
inferno16–140.0117%19 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0120%18 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0224%17 Apr
mirage13–80.0222%17 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0115%9 Apr
mirage7–130.0019%9 Apr
dust214–160.0526%8 Apr
nuke15–150.0421%6 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0523%6 Apr
overpass13–100.0823%5 Apr
inferno12–160.0620%5 Apr
dust213–80.0330%5 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0220%5 Apr
dust24–9-0.047%5 Apr
mirage13–70.0719%4 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0811%4 Apr
mirage4–130.0136%1 Apr
inferno13–80.0331%1 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0135%1 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →