ℍ𝕚𝕣𝕠𝕤𝕙𝕚 — CS2 Stats

76561198857481308[U:1:897215580]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,358Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3476 of 23710 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,203 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning69

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.1

Aggression10.0

Utility5.1

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels6.8

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.9

Utility5.1

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels6.8

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time614ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms

Headshot accuracy29.0%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

9Longest win streak

W2Current streak

12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 36anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	36	22–14	61%	0.02
dust2	A	29	16–13	55%	0.03
ancient	A	22	12–10	55%	0.03
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.03
inferno	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.01
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

978Matches

52%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

77.8ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	370	50%	1.06	15.5
Dust2	282	56%	1.13	16.3
Ancient	108	55%	1.10	16.1
Anubis	72	35%	0.92	14.9
Inferno	72	53%	1.03	15.8
Nuke	24	46%	1.02	15.0
Overpass	14	43%	1.05	16.3
Train	7	43%	1.06	15.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy

38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.5%Spray accuracy

88.0%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

609msReaction time

62.5%T opening success

52.2%CT opening success

0.77Enemies flashed / flash

6.3%Flash assists

7.87HE damage / grenade

4.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–2	0.06	27%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.12	37%	28 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	35%	27 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.08	40%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	38%	26 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	16%	25 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	28%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.09	44%	25 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	34%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	37%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	42%	24 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	28%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.07	26%	24 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.07	24%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	27%	24 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	47%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.09	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.00	31%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	32%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	40%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	26%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	26%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.10	29%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	25%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.04	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	35%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.03	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.03	30%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.12	25%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	33%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	33%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.08	29%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	31%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	32%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.02	36%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	32%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	28%	12 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.04	41%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	28%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	18%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	12%	10 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	35%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	37%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	40%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	29%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.17	31%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	33%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	35%	2 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.05	63%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	20%	31 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	27%	31 Jul →
dust2	0–5	0.01	31%	29 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	24%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.13	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	32%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	19%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.10	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.07	28%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	29%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	22%	26 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.11	43%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	50%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.06	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	26%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.03	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	33%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.01	16%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	29%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.11	25%	24 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	31%	24 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	53%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	35%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	38%	22 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.00	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.00	10%	22 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.05	22%	22 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	19%	22 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	26%	20 Jul →