Bodurka — CS2 Stats

76561198856441527[U:1:896175799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,172Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,698 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning50

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression3.4

Utility5.4

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning5.0

Utility5.4

Mechanics4.6

Opening Duels1.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time575ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy24.3%+2.1%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — vertigo 9–7

13–1Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	22	13–9	59%	0.01
anubis	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
eldorado	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00
debris	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.00
poseidon	C	7	3–4	43%	0.08
nuke	S	7	5–2	71%	0.03
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	0.07
mirage	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.02
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
dust2	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
sanctum	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,400Matches

52%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

78.8ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	303	46%	1.04	16.0
Anubis	300	56%	1.03	15.7
Ancient	272	50%	0.98	15.3
Vertigo	144	56%	1.13	17.0
Nuke	104	54%	1.08	16.3
Dust2	50	36%	0.99	13.8
Overpass	44	59%	1.05	16.5
Cache	35	57%	1.12	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

70.5%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

536msReaction time

21.7%T opening success

38.0%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

8.48HE damage / grenade

11.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4794 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.7343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
eldorado	9–6	-0.04	11%	27 Aug →
debris	9–4	0.03	19%	27 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	11%	23 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	26%	22 Aug →
poseidon	9–2	0.02	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	29%	21 Aug →
debris	9–3	-0.01	11%	21 Aug →
vertigo	5–9	0.09	42%	21 Aug →
mirage	19–22	-0.02	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.04	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.00	18%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.12	29%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	20%	7 Aug →
eldorado	9–4	-0.02	53%	6 Aug →
eldorado	4–9	-0.05	20%	6 Aug →
poseidon	7–9	0.00	32%	6 Aug →
overpass	8–8	-0.02	40%	6 Aug →
vertigo	2–9	-0.08	25%	6 Aug →
debris	9–7	-0.02	37%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	24%	1 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.26	67%	29 Jul →
vertigo	4–9	-0.13	9%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–6	0.11	22%	29 Jul →
eldorado	9–4	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.12	14%	29 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	0.14	42%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	16%	29 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.07	23%	29 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.01	19%	25 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.11	19%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	27%	21 Jul →
nuke	19–17	0.05	15%	15 Jul →
eldorado	9–3	0.01	33%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	9%	12 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	19%	12 Jul →
poseidon	2–9	-0.11	50%	11 Jul →
eldorado	9–2	0.13	35%	11 Jul →
debris	2–9	-0.07	22%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	16%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	13%	10 Jul →
boulder	13–5	-0.06	21%	10 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
poseidon	9–3	0.26	16%	10 Jul →
eldorado	4–9	-0.02	33%	10 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.07	17%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	19%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	10%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.10	22%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.00	11%	10 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	16%	10 Jul →
shelter	11–13	-0.05	23%	9 Jul →
eldorado	8–8	-0.00	17%	9 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.02	18%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.01	26%	8 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	34%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	23%	6 Jul →
ancient	5–8	0.03	30%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	24%	6 Jul →
nuke	17–19	-0.02	23%	5 Jul →
sanctum	9–5	0.08	38%	4 Jul →
poseidon	4–9	-0.01	25%	4 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.05	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.10	34%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.00	17%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.05	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	22%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.03	19%	1 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.02	21%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.01	11%	28 Jun →
mirage	16–13	0.03	21%	27 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	16%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.10	30%	27 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	13%	19 Jun →
anubis	13–16	-0.03	17%	19 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.02	36%	14 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	26%	13 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.12	23%	9 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.05	25%	9 Jun →
cache	19–16	-0.00	29%	7 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.04	26%	29 May →
ancient	11–13	0.05	16%	29 May →
vertigo	9–7	0.29	36%	27 May →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	17%	26 May →
inferno	9–6	0.26	23%	26 May →
ancient	13–2	0.04	22%	26 May →
anubis	13–2	-0.02	22%	25 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	29%	25 May →
inferno	4–9	-0.06	28%	21 May →
sanctum	8–8	0.09	34%	21 May →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	26%	17 May →
ancient	19–17	-0.01	15%	16 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	6%	14 May →
ancient	10–13	0.05	10%	14 May →
poseidon	9–4	0.25	33%	14 May →
anubis	13–11	0.10	23%	12 May →
anubis	13–6	0.04	15%	11 May →
nuke	2–13	0.04	21%	11 May →