MRKKW — CS2 Stats

76561198853431719[U:1:893165991]✓ No bans

649Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,374Purple band · top ~15% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17215 of 35374 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMRKKWFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,374 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning59
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50455Last 10050%Win rateWWLLLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression7.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–9
131Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27161159%0.02
ancientA1911858%0.01
dust2C145936%-0.00
nukeD103730%-0.01
cacheC104640%0.02
infernoC94544%0.01
anubisS86275%0.04
overpass31233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
48%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
80.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.1415.9
Dust2743%0.8915.7
Cache580%1.5417.6
Ancient333%1.0018.0
Inferno333%1.9921.7
Anubis367%1.4919.7
Nuke20%0.9418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
583msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4011% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.028%23 Aug
anubis13–40.0232%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0119%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0114%19 Aug
dust213–16-0.0018%18 Aug
cache15–150.0424%13 Aug
ancient13–110.0420%13 Aug
dust213–50.0727%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.037%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0116%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0116%5 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0121%5 Aug
mirage6–130.0519%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0326%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0926%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0318%31 Jul
nuke13–60.0333%31 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0317%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0825%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.0616%30 Jul
ancient16–120.1224%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0726%25 Jul
cache13–90.0313%22 Jul
anubis13–110.029%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0120%21 Jul
nuke13–160.019%19 Jul
ancient13–90.1215%19 Jul
ancient11–130.0221%18 Jul
dust216–140.0424%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0623%12 Jun
overpass10–130.0224%11 Jun
cache6–130.0419%10 Jun
cache4–13-0.0211%10 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0610%6 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0212%6 Jun
cache1–130.0121%6 Jun
mirage16–120.0516%5 Jun
anubis13–30.0740%2 Jun
ancient13–100.0216%1 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0622%31 May
inferno13–80.0019%22 May
overpass3–13-0.0741%22 May
mirage9–130.0220%21 May
anubis10–130.0429%20 May
dust211–13-0.0218%20 May
overpass13–40.0615%14 May
ancient13–80.0524%14 May
cache13–11-0.0023%7 May
mirage15–15-0.0315%2 May
mirage3–13-0.0723%1 May
cache13–60.0721%30 Apr
cache7–110.0217%29 Apr
anubis8–130.0210%29 Apr
ancient13–40.1123%28 Apr
cache13–70.0716%28 Apr
anubis13–100.0816%23 Apr
mirage8–130.0518%22 Apr
mirage14–160.0319%22 Apr
mirage13–40.0114%21 Apr
mirage7–13-0.018%21 Apr
dust22–13-0.0026%19 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0018%16 Apr
mirage13–70.0511%13 Apr
mirage10–130.0424%13 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0711%12 Apr
mirage13–50.0826%12 Apr
inferno13–110.1015%12 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0115%12 Apr
inferno13–50.0324%10 Apr
dust210–13-0.0118%10 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0324%10 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0310%10 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0810%10 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0130%9 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0313%9 Apr
ancient8–13-0.076%8 Apr
nuke13–40.0519%8 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0124%8 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0110%7 Apr
ancient13–50.0321%7 Apr
ancient13–80.0213%5 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0516%5 Apr
dust213–80.0221%5 Apr
dust215–15-0.039%4 Apr
mirage13–70.0117%4 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0114%3 Apr
mirage13–40.1016%3 Apr
dust216–130.0212%3 Apr
anubis13–10.0522%3 Apr
ancient13–50.0110%3 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0411%3 Apr
inferno13–70.0211%2 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0213%2 Apr
ancient7–00.039%2 Apr
mirage16–130.0223%1 Apr
mirage13–90.0421%1 Apr
mirage13–30.0921%31 Mar
mirage13–90.0313%31 Mar
dust25–13-0.0228%31 Mar
dust24–13-0.0219%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →