Malqs

Malqs — CS2 Stats

SE76561198850848314[U:1:890582586]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,746Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,306Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10326 of 38917 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,341 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMalqsFACEITLevel 10 · 2,341 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,306 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5743Last 10057%Win rateWWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression5.1
Utility2.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time541ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2112957%0.01
nukeS1913668%0.01
dust2B1991047%-0.00
anubisS1410471%0.01
mirageB136746%-0.02
infernoA127558%0.01
cache1010%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,699Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.0ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust235551%1.0615.8
Ancient32052%1.0616.5
Mirage27644%1.0115.1
Anubis25454%1.1016.9
Nuke18955%1.0716.3
Inferno18944%1.0716.3
Train4757%1.0415.5
Overpass4151%0.9814.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
537msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0118%29 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0330%29 Aug
ancient7–130.0534%27 Aug
ancient13–50.0231%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0816%26 Aug
anubis13–110.0116%26 Aug
dust213–110.0124%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0219%26 Aug
nuke11–130.0918%22 Aug
nuke13–70.1131%21 Aug
dust213–30.0623%21 Aug
inferno13–70.1332%19 Aug
anubis13–80.0830%19 Aug
inferno19–150.0322%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0325%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0825%11 Aug
dust28–130.0227%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0216%11 Aug
anubis13–10.0535%11 Aug
dust213–11-0.0023%11 Aug
ancient16–190.0119%10 Aug
dust27–130.0040%9 Aug
ancient10–130.0222%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0127%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0216%8 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0020%7 Aug
dust213–90.0722%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0415%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0515%2 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0715%31 Jul
cache14–16-0.0121%31 Jul
mirage13–10.0117%28 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0928%6 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0319%6 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0515%6 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0521%5 Jun
inferno13–100.0421%4 Jun
ancient13–20.0724%4 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0317%25 May
nuke4–13-0.0118%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.097%19 Apr
ancient13–110.0725%19 Apr
inferno5–130.0140%12 Apr
inferno13–30.1320%12 Apr
nuke13–80.0329%12 Apr
nuke13–60.0313%11 Apr
ancient13–100.0929%9 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0620%29 Mar
ancient13–40.0222%27 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0344%27 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0622%16 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0315%15 Mar
nuke9–5-0.0234%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0223%13 Mar
mirage13–110.0011%13 Mar
ancient13–30.0130%8 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0629%7 Mar
dust213–70.0436%7 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0622%5 Mar
anubis13–100.0223%4 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0321%2 Mar
dust212–16-0.0325%2 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0925%26 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0112%24 Feb
nuke13–70.0328%24 Feb
dust216–130.0128%23 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0422%22 Feb
mirage11–130.0117%21 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0014%20 Feb
anubis13–80.0120%19 Feb
anubis13–100.0724%19 Feb
anubis13–80.0117%19 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0311%15 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0617%14 Feb
inferno6–130.0224%8 Feb
anubis9–130.0322%6 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0315%4 Feb
dust211–13-0.0318%4 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0726%3 Feb
mirage4–13-0.087%3 Feb
dust27–13-0.0431%2 Feb
mirage13–100.0317%2 Feb
dust29–13-0.0529%1 Feb
dust29–13-0.0023%1 Feb
dust211–13-0.0234%31 Jan
dust213–50.0738%30 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0433%30 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0025%29 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0621%29 Jan
inferno13–100.0326%27 Jan
dust213–50.0120%26 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0511%24 Jan
dust24–13-0.0531%18 Jan
inferno11–130.0223%18 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0414%16 Jan
ancient13–110.0124%11 Jan
nuke13–20.0331%11 Jan
nuke16–130.0325%10 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0428%8 Jan
nuke13–100.0825%7 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →