Boggs

Boggs — CS2 Stats

76561198848099920[U:1:887834192]Steam profile ↗

1,537Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,103Blue band · top ~49.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19926 of 27872 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBoggsFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,103 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47503Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.1
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–6
121Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L7Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10dust2Weakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1971237%0.00
dust2D1861233%0.01
mirageC1771041%0.00
nukeA169756%0.03
ancientA148657%0.01
anubisS108280%0.03
infernoD62433%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,015Matches
49%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
87.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2450%1.0117.0
Ancient2143%1.0416.6
Anubis1547%1.1517.9
Cache1346%0.9816.5
Dust21338%0.8515.2
Nuke956%0.9115.6
Inferno633%0.8819.3
Vertigo333%1.1716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
566msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
6.54HE damage / grenade
8.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9706% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0522%22 Aug
cache9–13-0.0911%16 Aug
ancient11–130.000%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0227%14 Aug
cache3–13-0.0042%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0523%14 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0314%14 Aug
anubis13–100.0427%13 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0416%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0511%13 Aug
ancient16–140.0725%13 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0624%12 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0517%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0415%12 Aug
inferno6–13-0.069%12 Aug
ancient10–6-0.0114%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0513%12 Aug
dust215–150.0825%12 Aug
mirage13–30.0314%12 Aug
nuke12–10.0332%12 Aug
dust23–13-0.0436%12 Aug
cache8–130.0432%12 Aug
cache13–70.0217%11 Aug
ancient15–150.0313%11 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0124%11 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0124%11 Aug
cache8–13-0.0026%11 Aug
cache13–80.0534%11 Aug
dust213–60.068%11 Aug
mirage16–19-0.0414%10 Aug
cache2–13-0.0332%10 Aug
cache13–70.0513%10 Aug
inferno0–13-0.117%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0116%9 Aug
mirage13–80.0616%9 Aug
anubis16–140.0216%8 Aug
anubis13–100.0427%8 Aug
cache16–13-0.0318%7 Aug
cache4–130.0134%6 Aug
dust28–130.0324%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0115%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0813%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0224%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.0328%3 Aug
anubis13–60.0020%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.067%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0819%1 Aug
dust213–7-0.068%31 Jul
mirage7–130.0122%31 Jul
ancient13–70.000%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0421%30 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0416%29 Jul
ancient7–00.0427%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0311%29 Jul
anubis8–130.0718%29 Jul
dust213–30.0121%29 Jul
cache13–100.1420%29 Jul
cache13–6-0.0235%29 Jul
nuke8–130.0115%29 Jul
nuke13–50.0823%29 Jul
cache15–15-0.0130%29 Jul
dust213–20.0617%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0932%28 Jul
dust26–13-0.0114%27 Jul
mirage1–130.0127%27 Jul
nuke13–50.0218%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%27 Jul
ancient13–60.1534%26 Jul
anubis16–140.0531%26 Jul
nuke16–140.0713%26 Jul
nuke4–130.0629%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0518%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0267%26 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0023%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0723%24 Jul
cache3–13-0.0411%24 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0026%24 Jul
nuke13–160.0224%24 Jul
dust28–130.0629%24 Jul
anubis13–90.0221%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0228%23 Jul
nuke7–130.1120%22 Jul
anubis13–70.0116%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.0523%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0118%21 Jul
anubis13–20.0819%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0027%20 Jul
dust29–130.0120%20 Jul
dust22–13-0.0519%20 Jul
dust22–8-0.049%19 Jul
cache13–160.0019%18 Jul
inferno13–90.0513%18 Jul
dust213–20.099%18 Jul
nuke13–160.0419%12 Jul
nuke9–130.0524%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0117%11 Jul
inferno9–13-0.059%10 Jul
ancient16–120.008%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0823%8 Jul
cache7–130.0924%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →