gabi fleszar — CS2 Stats

76561198823164788[U:1:862899060]

417Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,736 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgabi fleszarFACEITLevel 9 · 1,736 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48457Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression4.9
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time563ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
28In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B38182047%-0.03
cacheB1910953%-0.01
mirageB168850%-0.01
nukeB105550%-0.04
anubisC73443%-0.04
ancient43175%-0.03
overpass21150%0.02
inferno2020%-0.07
office1010%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
60%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5558%1.0415.6
Dust23667%1.1315.4
Anubis2952%1.0316.4
Nuke1958%0.9614.5
Ancient1662%0.8111.9
Inferno683%1.3816.0
Vertigo333%0.8411.7
Cache1100%1.3121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
563msReaction time
33.3%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
4.98HE damage / grenade
10.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4572 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3383% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0926%30 Aug
overpass13–80.0911%14 Aug
cache13–110.0712%14 Aug
cache4–13-0.0514%13 Aug
nuke12–3-0.043%13 Aug
inferno4–13-0.105%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.1114%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0120%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.104%2 Aug
mirage6–130.0615%31 Jul
dust213–5-0.0733%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.099%26 Jul
mirage13–60.1924%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0713%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0112%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0224%20 Jul
cache13–40.0531%19 Jul
nuke13–80.0313%18 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1016%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0117%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.047%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0513%17 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0314%15 Jul
office0–13-0.03100%12 Jul
cache13–70.017%9 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0717%1 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0119%30 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0315%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0219%28 Jun
dust25–13-0.0621%27 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0521%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0119%26 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0413%25 Jun
mirage6–13-0.099%22 Jun
dust213–20.0422%15 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0218%12 Jun
cache13–10-0.0219%11 Jun
dust26–130.0212%3 Jun
anubis13–60.0619%2 Jun
cache13–40.0726%2 Jun
dust213–9-0.0033%31 May
anubis7–13-0.0213%30 May
nuke4–130.0125%30 May
vertigo6–13-0.0233%30 May
ancient7–13-0.028%30 May
cache2–13-0.0323%30 May
dust213–5-0.0418%23 May
overpass12–12-0.0515%23 May
cache13–4-0.0221%21 May
cache13–5-0.0411%20 May
dust28–13-0.0122%20 May
mirage12–12-0.0112%16 May
cache5–13-0.0213%16 May
cache13–10-0.0123%16 May
cache12–12-0.0424%13 May
cache13–20.0025%12 May
cache12–12-0.0025%10 May
cache8–13-0.0219%3 May
cache13–10-0.0226%3 May
dust213–50.0213%28 Apr
dust213–6-0.0614%26 Apr
dust211–13-0.0519%26 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0314%15 Apr
dust213–8-0.0523%9 Apr
anubis11–13-0.1020%5 Apr
dust211–13-0.0416%4 Apr
dust212–12-0.0617%1 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0424%1 Apr
dust27–13-0.1023%29 Mar
dust210–13-0.0228%15 Mar
dust213–10-0.0724%11 Mar
dust213–70.0113%6 Mar
dust210–13-0.0310%4 Mar
nuke5–2-0.0925%4 Mar
dust27–13-0.0216%4 Mar
nuke13–20.0114%1 Mar
dust29–130.0326%27 Feb
dust213–2-0.0516%23 Feb
dust213–7-0.0122%20 Feb
dust26–130.0318%16 Feb
dust211–13-0.0216%16 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0719%15 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0418%15 Feb
dust213–6-0.0520%15 Feb
dust213–2-0.0144%12 Feb
ancient13–60.0021%8 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0224%7 Feb
dust213–7-0.0214%4 Feb
dust212–12-0.0621%30 Jan
dust213–00.0524%30 Jan
nuke13–4-0.0838%25 Jan
mirage10–13-0.078%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0212%24 Jan
dust213–80.0223%24 Jan
dust212–12-0.0917%21 Jan
dust213–00.0914%21 Jan
dust216–140.0117%20 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0225%18 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0717%18 Jan
anubis6–13-0.0218%17 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →