𝙿.𝙽 — CS2 Stats

76561198822896409[U:1:862630681]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,732Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16453 of 42010 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,549 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning58

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.1

Utility3.9

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.8

Utility3.9

Mechanics5.2

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time529ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–3

13–3Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 26% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	16–16	50%	0.00
dust2	D	23	6–17	26%	-0.02
cache	S	13	9–4	69%	0.05
nuke	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

289Matches

53%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

78.5ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	91	49%	1.07	15.8
Dust2	30	60%	0.94	14.8
Inferno	28	57%	1.05	15.7
Ancient	17	65%	1.14	16.5
Anubis	17	53%	0.76	13.8
Nuke	14	36%	0.94	15.8
Overpass	9	78%	0.92	14.8
Cache	6	50%	1.11	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

73.5%Counter-strafing

7.7°Preaim

532msReaction time

35.3%T opening success

48.8%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

8.42HE damage / grenade

6.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4897 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.2511% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	-0.10	19%	26 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	22%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	30%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	19%	13 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	31%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	10%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	29%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.06	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	19%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	18%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	19%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	29%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	22%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.00	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	0%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.02	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.01	17%	20 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.04	27%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	20%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.11	38%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	26%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	20%	13 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	10%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.01	10%	13 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	17%	12 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	29%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	26%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	31%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.08	14%	9 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.17	8%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	19%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	23%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.08	20%	6 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	41%	5 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	32%	2 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	15%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.00	11%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	20%	25 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	27%	25 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.04	6%	3 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	38%	31 May →
mirage	13–5	0.05	20%	17 May →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	44%	15 May →
inferno	13–5	0.03	18%	15 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.10	6%	15 May →
dust2	10–13	0.04	21%	7 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	18%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.02	19%	2 May →
cache	13–4	0.11	25%	30 Apr →
cache	13–5	-0.01	23%	30 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.00	14%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	0.14	32%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.04	7%	29 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	21%	26 Apr →
ancient	15–15	0.02	28%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.03	22%	26 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	19%	19 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	35%	19 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	20%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	16%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	36%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.07	25%	13 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	12%	12 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	22%	12 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.05	16%	12 Apr →
inferno	4–9	-0.03	36%	12 Apr →
train	13–9	0.16	32%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.13	21%	12 Apr →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	20%	10 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.08	17%	10 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	35%	10 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	31%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.00	16%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.00	22%	9 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.01	16%	9 Apr →
dust2	6–13	0.01	25%	9 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.00	22%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.03	20%	8 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.03	11%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	15%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.00	11%	6 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	22%	6 Apr →
nuke	12–15	-0.01	28%	5 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	19%	5 Apr →
dust2	11–13	0.03	19%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.09	32%	5 Apr →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	19%	5 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	10%	4 Apr →
nuke	7–13	0.00	29%	4 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	10%	3 Apr →