Krokos*And1cs — CS2 Stats

DE76561198816707170[U:1:856441442]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,054Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,194Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17862 of 56617 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning51

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWLWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7

Aggression5.4

Utility4.7

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.1

Utility4.7

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time669ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms

Headshot accuracy26.6%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 11–13

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	29	13–16	45%	0.03
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
mirage	D	16	5–11	31%	0.01
cache	A	12	7–5	58%	0.02
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	0.01
dust2	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
anubis	—	4	0–4	0%	0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

453Matches

50%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

81.7ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	45	56%	1.51	18.4
Anubis	19	58%	1.35	19.0
Ancient	18	61%	1.19	15.9
Dust2	14	57%	1.29	18.8
Vertigo	11	27%	1.16	18.2
Mirage	8	12%	0.97	14.3
Nuke	6	50%	1.02	15.2
Overpass	5	40%	1.41	25.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.3%Headshot accuracy

34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.5%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

662msReaction time

27.3%T opening success

43.5%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

11.52HE damage / grenade

6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3878 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.3377% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	7–13	0.06	28%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	27%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	20%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	23%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.04	34%	12 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.03	28%	7 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	20%	7 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	27%	5 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	25%	2 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	14%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	31%	1 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	30%	1 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	27%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	15%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	19%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	43%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	29%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.11	38%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	33%	22 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.02	21%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.04	35%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.10	32%	21 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.04	26%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.07	36%	20 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.08	28%	20 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	21%	19 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.09	34%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	24%	18 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.04	23%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.11	42%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.13	33%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	39%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	29%	16 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	36%	16 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.05	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	31%	14 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	26%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	34%	13 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.01	49%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	27%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.14	27%	12 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	39%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	23%	11 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	32%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	26%	2 Jul →
ancient	12–16	0.02	16%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	23%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.00	20%	27 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	30%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	24%	26 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	23%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.02	23%	24 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.04	32%	23 Jun →
mirage	10–7	0.06	36%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.09	19%	18 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	39%	18 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	35%	18 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.08	32%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.08	24%	15 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	20%	14 Jun →
ancient	16–14	0.06	25%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	23%	11 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.03	25%	11 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.09	56%	10 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	26%	10 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.02	29%	9 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.05	34%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.08	23%	7 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	23%	4 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	39%	2 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	35%	2 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.06	38%	1 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	43%	31 May →
nuke	7–13	0.01	19%	12 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	24%	11 May →
mirage	9–13	0.01	26%	8 May →
cache	6–13	-0.06	30%	30 Apr →
mirage	12–16	0.00	26%	23 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	19%	23 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.02	19%	18 Apr →
inferno	12–16	0.08	31%	11 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.00	19%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.02	40%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	28%	10 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.06	32%	6 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.00	22%	1 Apr →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	27%	30 Mar →
dust2	13–7	0.06	33%	28 Mar →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	24%	23 Mar →
mirage	12–16	0.01	31%	18 Mar →
inferno	11–13	0.15	44%	18 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.05	30%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	12%	16 Mar →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	32%	12 Mar →