Roby-_- — CS2 Stats

76561198816176788[U:1:855911060]

1,735Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#31794 of 37617 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,661Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,661
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 339 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRoby-_-PEAK ELO2,661csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44551Last 10044%Win rateWLWLLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression5.7
Utility4.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 2–0
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26131350%0.01
mirageC2691735%0.01
ancientB2091145%0.03
anubisC114736%-0.04
infernoB84450%0.00
nukeA53260%0.03
overpass32167%-0.03
cache1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

736Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
83.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20056%1.0817.1
Ancient9953%1.1718.6
Dust29464%1.1816.4
Anubis6758%1.0716.3
Inferno2741%1.0918.1
Vertigo1533%1.0217.5
Nuke1136%0.8913.9
Train875%1.1815.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
587msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.63HE damage / grenade
6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.443 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.4458% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0310%23 Aug
cache8–13-0.0218%22 Aug
dust213–80.0429%18 Aug
dust23–130.0813%16 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0522%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0014%17 Jul
inferno15–15-0.025%17 Jul
dust213–90.0119%16 Jul
dust22–13-0.0535%16 Jul
dust213–70.0623%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0311%11 Jul
mirage13–50.0527%9 Jul
mirage14–160.0315%4 Jul
mirage13–00.0250%29 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0315%29 Jun
dust28–130.0231%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0711%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0113%16 May
mirage13–90.0522%8 May
dust26–130.0130%5 May
mirage3–13-0.0618%5 May
mirage10–130.1128%4 May
dust23–130.0418%4 May
inferno13–6-0.0320%4 May
mirage13–10.0050%4 May
ancient6–130.0221%4 May
ancient13–50.0813%3 May
ancient10–130.0225%2 May
anubis13–110.0116%30 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0124%30 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0020%29 Apr
nuke12–160.0625%28 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0015%27 Apr
dust23–13-0.0612%27 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0216%27 Apr
ancient13–100.1215%26 Apr
ancient13–20.0926%26 Apr
nuke13–20.0716%25 Apr
anubis6–130.0423%23 Apr
mirage7–130.0018%23 Apr
mirage5–130.0713%22 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0930%22 Apr
inferno13–80.0710%21 Apr
dust27–2-0.0420%21 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0331%21 Apr
mirage13–110.1023%20 Apr
ancient13–110.0520%19 Apr
anubis7–13-0.067%19 Apr
anubis12–160.0015%19 Apr
nuke13–40.0425%19 Apr
anubis13–9-0.1023%18 Apr
dust24–13-0.0224%18 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0125%18 Apr
mirage5–130.0117%17 Apr
dust28–130.0225%17 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0213%17 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1118%16 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0313%16 Apr
dust213–30.0523%15 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0015%15 Apr
ancient0–2-0.020%15 Apr
nuke11–130.0218%15 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0412%14 Apr
inferno13–30.0617%14 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0422%14 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0215%13 Apr
dust213–100.0110%13 Apr
dust213–00.0530%13 Apr
dust213–10-0.0312%13 Apr
dust29–130.0519%13 Apr
ancient8–130.0019%13 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0619%13 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0214%12 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0416%12 Apr
ancient8–20.0526%12 Apr
ancient13–00.0425%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0415%12 Apr
dust23–13-0.0537%12 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0318%11 Apr
mirage5–130.0016%11 Apr
mirage2–00.12100%11 Apr
dust213–7-0.0012%11 Apr
ancient11–130.0416%11 Apr
dust213–90.0313%11 Apr
dust216–14-0.0310%10 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0926%10 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0315%9 Apr
mirage8–130.0623%9 Apr
dust28–130.0520%9 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0417%9 Apr
ancient13–30.0118%8 Apr
dust26–13-0.0324%8 Apr
overpass13–9-0.062%7 Apr
dust213–10-0.0120%6 Apr
inferno13–60.0613%6 Apr
dust24–130.0024%6 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0116%6 Apr
ancient13–00.1213%6 Apr
ancient13–160.0116%5 Apr
ancient3–130.0929%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →