Don Porkleone — CS2 Stats

76561198811841656[U:1:851575928]

1,672Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,098Blue band · top ~43.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34333 of 50298 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDon PorkleoneFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,098 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning51
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateWWWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression5.5
Utility3.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 739ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning5.1
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time732ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 732ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–5
133Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 90% over 10nukeWeakest map · 42% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27131448%-0.02
nukeC24101442%-0.03
dust2B168850%-0.02
ancientS109190%-0.01
anubisB105550%-0.03
infernoS75271%0.01
cache440100%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.02
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

425Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
73.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8152%1.0714.9
Inferno5657%1.0415.1
Anubis4439%0.9614.8
Dust23566%0.9715.3
Vertigo2854%1.0014.6
Ancient2335%1.1517.1
Nuke1258%0.9714.3
Train1050%0.8713.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
739msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
4.75HE damage / grenade
6.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7827° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 739.1095ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4753 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.037%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0415%30 Aug
cache13–5-0.0042%29 Aug
inferno13–50.1021%29 Aug
dust214–16-0.0623%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0017%29 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0613%27 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0126%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0212%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0618%7 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0718%7 Aug
dust213–16-0.0311%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0326%4 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1121%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.066%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0611%3 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0314%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0022%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0310%2 Aug
ancient13–90.0813%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0313%1 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0417%1 Aug
dust213–9-0.0412%1 Aug
nuke13–8-0.048%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0224%31 Jul
vertigo13–40.0213%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0916%30 Jul
ancient9–1-0.0115%30 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0821%30 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0229%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0532%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0026%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0017%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0732%29 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0517%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0914%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0121%28 Jul
mirage13–50.0035%28 Jul
cache13–4-0.0820%28 Jul
ancient13–6-0.039%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0612%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0420%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0120%26 Jul
mirage12–120.0925%26 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0315%25 Jul
dust213–8-0.0124%25 Jul
mirage13–70.029%25 Jul
cache13–80.0233%25 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0220%16 Jul
nuke4–130.0320%16 Jul
cache13–70.0422%16 Jul
dust213–90.0213%16 Jul
nuke13–30.0428%15 Jul
ancient13–60.0121%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0126%15 Jul
anubis7–110.0619%15 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0420%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0518%9 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0614%5 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0724%26 May
mirage4–13-0.0720%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0619%25 May
nuke13–9-0.0136%21 May
dust213–8-0.0316%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0417%20 May
mirage13–50.0525%20 May
nuke11–13-0.0624%18 May
dust29–13-0.0717%16 May
nuke7–13-0.0429%16 May
overpass7–13-0.0228%30 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0131%30 Apr
nuke3–13-0.1024%26 Apr
nuke13–6-0.067%26 Apr
dust213–30.0718%26 Apr
anubis8–13-0.1217%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0313%24 Apr
anubis9–13-0.1019%24 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0725%23 Apr
anubis13–10-0.014%23 Apr
mirage13–30.065%23 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0217%23 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0234%21 Apr
dust210–13-0.0219%21 Apr
dust26–13-0.0311%21 Apr
nuke5–130.0214%21 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0222%21 Apr
dust213–8-0.0423%21 Apr
anubis13–80.0629%21 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0320%21 Apr
dust213–6-0.0214%18 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0522%18 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0211%18 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0430%16 Apr
dust213–16-0.0519%16 Apr
inferno13–80.0516%16 Apr
nuke1–13-0.115%15 Apr
dust213–90.0324%15 Apr
mirage16–140.0017%15 Apr
inferno13–70.0415%15 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0914%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →