d0nkworry' — CS2 Stats

76561198800371998[U:1:840106270]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,022Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,777Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13972 of 39836 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,436 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning37

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression3.4

Utility4.1

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning3.7

Utility4.1

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time631ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms

Headshot accuracy22.2%+7.2%

first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–7

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.01
inferno	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.01
ancient	A	18	11–7	61%	-0.01
cache	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
dust2	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.03
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.00
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,153Matches

50%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

76.0ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	216	50%	1.01	14.3
Mirage	198	50%	1.08	14.3
Ancient	139	51%	1.11	15.9
Anubis	109	57%	1.03	15.2
Inferno	70	53%	1.03	13.7
Nuke	44	36%	0.96	13.5
Overpass	24	54%	1.10	15.7
Cache	18	28%	1.39	15.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

81.8%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

630msReaction time

22.2%T opening success

29.9%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

3.0%Flash assists

11.92HE damage / grenade

7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3951 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.2088% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	3–5	-0.01	9%	29 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.05	13%	28 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	100%	28 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	17%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.09	32%	28 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	11%	27 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	13%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	14%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	10%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.05	18%	23 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	29%	23 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.10	50%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	22%	20 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	21%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.04	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	25%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	10%	19 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	17%	19 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	11%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	18%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	7%	19 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	22%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	13%	19 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	35%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	40%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	18%	18 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	25%	17 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	24%	17 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.09	33%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	10%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	19%	12 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	12%	12 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.09	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	15%	10 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	27%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	27%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	11%	3 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.06	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.04	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.08	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	9%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.03	24%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–0	0.06	17%	29 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	14%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.02	20%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	25%	24 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.03	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	23%	23 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	20%	23 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	9%	23 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	15%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	15%	22 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	6%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	23%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.01	17%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	3%	19 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	17%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.04	28%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.02	12%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.04	10%	13 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	16%	13 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.03	18%	12 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.01	30%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	5%	11 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.06	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.00	8%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	11%	10 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	18%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	13%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.09	27%	9 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	15%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	21%	6 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.05	13%	6 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	13%	6 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	17%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	15%	5 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	17%	4 Jul →