zziw-K — CS2 Stats

76561198800329847[U:1:840064119]

1,103Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning50
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46468Last 10046%Win rateLWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression6.1
Utility4.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time531ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — anubis 13–5
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB137654%-0.02
mirageD123925%-0.02
dust2A117464%-0.00
infernoC104640%0.01
ancientD93633%-0.02
nukeB84450%0.01
officeB84450%-0.03
anubisB63350%0.01
vertigo41325%0.00
shelter42250%-0.02
boulder41325%-0.02
italy330100%-0.01
train21150%-0.02
fachwerk220100%0.06
overpass21150%0.01
eldorado1010%-0.11
warden1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches
46%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
75.2ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1040%0.8812.6
Ancient838%0.7911.6
Inferno617%0.8813.7
Cache560%0.9515.6
Anubis367%0.8614.3
Dust22100%0.9613.0
Overpass250%0.334.5
Train10%1.1515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
90.0%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
506msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
11.18HE damage / grenade
5.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6981% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.090%30 Aug
anubis13–110.0014%30 Aug
dust213–90.0619%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0213%29 Aug
dust213–110.0114%29 Aug
vertigo16–14-0.0213%29 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0112%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0628%28 Aug
nuke1–13-0.087%26 Aug
cache13–6-0.0916%26 Aug
cache13–110.0218%26 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0311%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0218%25 Aug
cache13–7-0.0031%24 Aug
nuke13–10.0930%24 Aug
inferno10–130.0325%24 Aug
anubis13–50.1312%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0318%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0316%24 Aug
mirage13–90.0622%22 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0822%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0815%20 Aug
shelter6–13-0.0412%19 Aug
italy13–7-0.0311%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0419%18 Aug
anubis12–120.028%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0226%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0725%8 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0113%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0117%8 Aug
dust213–4-0.033%7 Aug
inferno12–120.0315%6 Aug
train13–110.0024%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0321%6 Aug
boulder1–13-0.0417%5 Aug
cache13–0-0.0219%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0213%3 Aug
boulder0–13-0.0615%3 Aug
dust23–130.0022%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0914%2 Aug
fachwerk13–40.0812%2 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0013%2 Aug
shelter13–20.0314%2 Aug
nuke12–120.0012%2 Aug
overpass13–50.0112%1 Aug
office11–13-0.0613%1 Aug
shelter5–13-0.0111%30 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0226%30 Jul
inferno9–50.1019%29 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0118%29 Jul
vertigo12–120.0018%29 Jul
office13–11-0.0917%24 Jul
vertigo12–120.0424%23 Jul
nuke13–9-0.028%23 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0413%20 Jul
italy13–9-0.015%20 Jul
shelter3–3-0.0867%20 Jul
cache1–13-0.025%19 Jul
cache13–60.0624%16 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0112%15 Jul
anubis11–130.0311%14 Jul
dust213–3-0.0213%14 Jul
office11–13-0.0416%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0111%13 Jul
eldorado8–8-0.116%12 Jul
boulder13–80.0719%11 Jul
fachwerk13–110.049%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0611%10 Jul
dust213–8-0.0717%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0812%9 Jul
boulder2–13-0.048%9 Jul
office13–7-0.0317%8 Jul
office13–60.0213%8 Jul
cache13–70.0221%8 Jul
inferno5–130.0211%5 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0416%5 Jul
overpass4–90.0123%5 Jul
dust213–30.1218%5 Jul
mirage7–130.0315%4 Jul
inferno13–160.0512%4 Jul
office13–10-0.0614%2 Jul
italy13–50.0132%2 Jul
cache13–70.0219%1 Jul
cache10–13-0.0115%1 Jul
dust23–13-0.0427%28 Jun
cache6–13-0.0518%25 Jun
nuke12–120.0415%24 Jun
nuke8–130.0517%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.076%22 Jun
office11–130.0219%18 Jun
train10–13-0.037%17 Jun
ancient8–130.018%16 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0615%15 Jun
office5–13-0.0150%12 Jun
warden12–12-0.059%12 Jun
ancient13–40.059%11 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0017%10 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0513%9 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0910%9 Jun
inferno13–40.037%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →