Etan

Etan — CS2 Stats

76561198799399368[U:1:839133640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

206Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 Learning
Premier CS Rating9,880Light Blue band · top ~55.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12928 of 17525 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEtanPREMIER9,880 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning53
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.4
Aggression4.3
Utility2.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning5.3
Utility2.2
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–1
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1111In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24111346%-0.01
nukeC2071335%-0.02
ancientC1981142%-0.01
mirageA1810856%-0.02
anubisA127558%-0.01
cache21150%-0.02
train21150%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.04
overpass110100%0.01
inferno110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
45%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
60.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

10%1v1 clutch win
5%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2560%0.559.0
Ancient425%0.8513.0
Nuke425%0.8610.8
Mirage367%0.9313.7
Anubis2100%0.8014.0
Cache20%0.264.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
66.7%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
620msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
5.34HE damage / grenade
1.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7415° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7252% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4206 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0312%22 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0218%22 Aug
nuke13–16-0.076%12 Aug
dust213–6-0.0212%12 Aug
dust213–7-0.0014%12 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0121%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0010%28 Jul
dust213–5-0.008%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0716%23 Jul
ancient13–3-0.022%23 Jul
nuke13–50.0926%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0412%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0515%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.115%21 Jul
dust212–16-0.0120%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0416%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.034%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0712%20 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0618%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0215%20 Jul
nuke9–13-0.019%20 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0711%20 Jul
nuke11–130.028%19 Jul
ancient13–110.0515%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0718%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0315%19 Jul
dust213–90.0823%19 Jul
nuke13–00.0615%18 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0511%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0320%18 Jul
mirage13–70.099%18 Jul
ancient9–13-0.088%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0511%17 Jul
ancient0–2-0.000%17 Jul
ancient11–13-0.048%16 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0615%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0218%15 Jul
anubis13–90.0117%14 Jul
dust215–15-0.0314%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0318%13 Jul
dust27–130.0119%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0719%13 Jul
ancient11–130.1014%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0919%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0116%12 Jul
cache6–130.0112%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0215%11 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0729%11 Jul
dust213–100.0120%11 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0012%10 Jul
mirage8–13-0.077%9 Jul
dust213–11-0.039%9 Jul
anubis13–90.0414%9 Jul
mirage13–110.029%8 Jul
vertigo8–13-0.0419%8 Jul
nuke0–20.0950%6 Jul
mirage13–40.014%5 Jul
anubis13–10-0.067%5 Jul
dust29–13-0.0116%5 Jul
anubis14–16-0.039%4 Jul
dust213–60.0429%3 Jul
dust213–60.028%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.087%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0413%3 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0814%2 Jul
dust213–80.0319%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0510%1 Jul
anubis13–8-0.066%1 Jul
dust211–00.035%29 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0111%29 Jun
mirage13–80.0020%28 Jun
dust211–13-0.0322%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.0322%27 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0120%27 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0514%25 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0415%25 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0119%24 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0523%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0624%24 Jun
ancient13–1-0.0215%24 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0413%23 Jun
dust213–50.038%23 Jun
nuke16–14-0.058%22 Jun
overpass13–110.0119%22 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0417%22 Jun
ancient6–13-0.058%21 Jun
ancient7–130.0215%20 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0315%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0918%20 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0714%16 Jun
ancient13–90.0123%16 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0318%31 May
ancient13–10.1614%31 May
anubis13–100.0310%31 May
mirage5–13-0.0512%31 May
ancient4–13-0.1112%30 May
train5–10-0.0629%16 Dec
dust29–13-0.0810%22 Oct
mirage13–110.0811%12 May
train13–10-0.0313%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →