DrixonSK — CS2 Stats

76561198798855093[U:1:838589365]✓ No bans

1,531Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,277Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4547 of 25445 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,838 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrixonSKFACEITLevel 10 · 1,838 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,277 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLWLWTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.9
Utility5.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy28.1%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–5
132Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 48% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB25121348%0.03
mirageB25121348%0.02
dust2S1812667%0.04
anubisS118373%0.05
cacheB84450%0.04
nukeA74357%0.03
ancient41325%0.06
office1010%-0.06
vertigo110100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

514Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
83.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15854%1.2217.0
Dust29455%1.1917.8
Inferno6846%1.0515.7
Ancient6447%1.1817.6
Nuke5761%1.2817.3
Anubis3566%1.2117.9
Overpass1429%1.0215.7
Train1362%0.9416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
535msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
7.57HE damage / grenade
8.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4968 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1635% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office0–3-0.060%28 Aug
dust213–110.0625%28 Aug
nuke6–130.0345%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0623%22 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0124%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0033%21 Aug
anubis13–100.0631%20 Aug
inferno11–130.0421%20 Aug
nuke13–30.0429%20 Aug
inferno13–100.0519%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0117%16 Aug
inferno9–20.1156%15 Aug
nuke9–30.1226%15 Aug
inferno9–60.1433%15 Aug
inferno13–40.0923%14 Aug
cache7–130.0131%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0432%13 Aug
dust213–60.0526%13 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1427%13 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0343%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0220%11 Aug
cache13–110.0224%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0025%10 Aug
vertigo13–50.1926%10 Aug
mirage6–130.0826%10 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0329%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0433%9 Aug
inferno5–130.0949%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0215%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0621%6 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0534%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0229%2 Aug
dust216–14-0.0333%2 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0422%2 Aug
dust214–160.0119%1 Aug
mirage13–40.0417%1 Aug
dust213–90.0323%1 Aug
anubis13–80.1117%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0425%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0118%31 Jul
mirage13–40.1920%31 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0321%31 Jul
inferno5–90.0331%31 Jul
inferno9–50.2034%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0129%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0139%30 Jul
mirage13–40.0230%30 Jul
dust25–130.0221%30 Jul
dust213–40.0723%30 Jul
dust214–16-0.0123%30 Jul
mirage12–160.0129%30 Jul
anubis13–80.1025%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0121%29 Jul
ancient13–20.1035%29 Jul
mirage13–20.0423%29 Jul
dust213–80.1130%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0119%29 Jul
inferno9–60.1520%29 Jul
nuke13–100.0730%29 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0013%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0318%29 Jul
anubis13–40.0719%29 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0819%29 Jul
inferno8–80.1035%29 Jul
ancient3–130.1332%29 Jul
ancient5–130.0224%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0824%27 Jul
inferno8–130.0436%27 Jul
inferno9–60.1347%27 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0711%27 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0213%27 Jul
anubis11–130.0323%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0322%27 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1246%27 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0715%27 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0122%25 Jul
mirage7–130.0617%25 Jul
dust213–80.0827%25 Jul
inferno13–60.0822%25 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0920%25 Jul
anubis13–60.1129%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1119%25 Jul
dust27–130.0126%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0614%24 Jul
anubis13–110.0915%24 Jul
cache13–110.0514%23 Jul
dust211–13-0.0222%23 Jul
anubis4–00.0420%23 Jul
dust213–20.0618%23 Jul
dust213–40.1821%23 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0121%23 Jul
dust213–50.0520%22 Jul
dust213–20.1339%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0024%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0331%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0616%21 Jul
cache7–130.0822%21 Jul
dust213–110.0330%21 Jul
cache13–40.0918%21 Jul
cache13–30.0815%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →